The weight and complexities of SEAM sacred me 9 months ago - it still does. Moreover with near 100 jsf/BIRT pages at present it is becoming almost impossible to slot in SEAM or Shale.
I am definitely biased - with the weight of 9 months of 'legacy' behind me. But I do think the conversation tag is the right way to go. Eagerly awaiting the WIKI... Thanks for the great work guys! Best regards, Yee -----Original Message----- From: Mario Ivankovits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 10:48 PM To: Thomas Heute Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: EJB3.0 and Backing Beans Design Hi! > If we could measure the complexity of a framework by the number of pages of > the documentation, the worse documented framework would be the simplest... > It wasn't the number of pages, but the number of different topics. I was asked about my opinion and so I answered AND I stated that I am biased, so I hoped that made it clear that my opinion on this topic is not the only one - and maybe not the right one. Sorry if I didn't manage to use the right words here. Ciao, Mario
