use the first as topic but the second as *example* content ;)
Thanks paul. BTW. are you using JSF in a portlet ? (I saw you are a ASF portal guy) -Matt On 7/10/06, Paul Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matthias, Should the issue be "facets available for components are not documented", "The 'detailStamp' facet for <t:dataTable> is not documented" or both? FYI: I will document this in the wiki http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Extended_Data_Table Paul Spencer Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > Right, > > can you create a ticket on this? so that this missing information isn't > lost > > There is a metadata JSR ongoing, that will contain *metadata* for > components like desired child-type, the facets etc > > -Matt > > On 7/10/06, Paul Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Where are the facets available for components documented? >> >> Based on the impl's TLD [1], I expect the facets are documented in the >> description of the tag. This is not consistently done in Tomahawk's TLD. >> >> As an example, the MasterDetail example [2] uses the facet >> "detailStamp". This facet is not documented in the TLD [3] or the >> "Extended Data Table" component page [4]. Thus I am not sure if this is >> a supported facet, or one created for the example. >> >> [1] http://myfaces.apache.org/impl/tlddoc/h/dataTable.html >> [2] http://www.irian.at/myfaces/masterDetail.jsp.source >> [3] http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/tlddoc/t/dataTable.html >> [4] http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/extDataTable.html >> >> Paul Spencer >> >> > >
-- Matthias Wessendorf futher stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
