Cosma Colanicchia a écrit :
They are not concurrents. MyFaces provides a JSF implementation (as
the Sun RI does), while ADF Faces/Trinidad is a library of components
with some added services. If you are talking about "MyFaces Tomahawk"
, then yes, there is some overlap with Trinidad, but they are probably
going to be merged in future.
Right now, you will have some troubles only using both Tomahawk and
Trinidad. For example Tomahawk components will not be aware of
Trinidad skinning system and of its client validation framework. I
think that it is better to choose one of the two until they'll be
merged or refactored to work well togheter.
thanks a lot.
Here is another question :
Is there a difference between "Oracle ADF Faces" and "Apache ADF
Faces/Trinidad" ?? Is it the same project ?
cyrille.
Regards
Cosma
2006/7/19, Cyrille37 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
::SammyRulez:: a écrit :
> my choices
>
> myfaces + tomahawk component: all the gui you need
> facelets: decouple design and component
> ajaxanywhere: add some exotic behaviour non breaking jsf cycle
Thank you very much for your comment.
What about MyFaces and ADF ? They seem concurents, isn't it ? Why we
should one or other ?
cyrille.
> Application Framework... I really don't need them.. I sense that good
> design ad c couple of utility classes ca do anything you need... IMHO
>
> 2006/7/19, Cyrille37 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hello,
>>
>> There are few projects around JSF that make me lost. I've to make a
>> choice to start the study of a future project, it's time for me to
>> select technologies.
>>
>> At first, I've to choice a Application Framework. Choices are Spring,
>> Tapestry.
>> Then a GUI Framework. Here is my problem, JSF is in spotlight so
looks
>> to be a good choice, but there are several projects and I could
not make
>> my choice.
>>
>> Have you got an opinion which could light me ??
>> Thanks you very much.
>> cyrille.
>>
>
>
