Since Trinidad has a *tree table* that might be useful for you
-Matthias On 7/18/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, the developer who worked on it in the beginning seems to have abandoned it - so if there is no one taking his place, it will remain in the current state. I have heard rumours under MyFaces developers though that something is in the go with regards to porting tree2 into the treetable. Maybe you want to join in with these efforts? regards, Martin On 7/18/06, Michael Südkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to hear your ideas ... > > I need a tree table for my project. It consists 99% of standard JSP pages > but we have begun to create new dialogs with MyFaces 1.1 JSFs. > > I evaluated the Tomahawk treetable. As stated by by other users here on the > list, it uses the deprecated t:tree rather than t:tree2. Is it possible to > use the treetable with t:tree2? > I need things like different node types and images that come from the file > system rather than the MyFaces jar file. > > I know there was also the advice to use the ADF treetable but I fear the > amount of changes it will experience when going through the integration into > MyFaces. > BTW, also the ADF treetable loads it's images from the JAR. Do you consider > that practically? An app design needs to be easily customizable by the > customers and the tree icons belong also to the design. So we need images in > the file system rather than statically inside the jar. > > I would like to hear a statement regarding the future of the Tomahawk > treetable. I could live for a while with the current one but if it will not > be developed further, I have to use something else from the beginning. > > Thanks for your comments. > > Michael > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
-- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
