Facelets is production ready. You will most likely encounter many more bugs (or perceived bugs) using JSP than Facelets.
I don't know how to use JSP and Facelets together. You might try the Facelets user mailing list.
Adam Brod
Product Development Team
| Colin Chalmers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
07/26/2006 02:47 PM
|
|
Guys,
I appreciate the feedback and am glad there are others successfully
implementing facelets. One comment I received was that facelets was too
experimental!?
I have already downloaded the examples and got them working in minutes :-)
Should we decide to migrate an older project to facelets is it possible
to use the two view technologies side-by-side so we could migrate page
by page?
I'm sure I saw something regarding setting a default view tech. in the
context?
Colin
Andrew Robinson wrote:
> My experience is that development with facelets over JSP-JSF is much
> faster and saves a lot of time (complex controls, templating,
> functions, etc. are all extremely time consuming or impossible with
> JSF on JSF). In addition, perforamnce is better. So your timeline
> should be less and your code faster. I still wonder why anyone would
> want to use JSF without Facelets except possibly when converting a
> legacy JSP application to JSF.
>
> On 7/26/06, *Adam Brod* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>
> If you search the mailing list, you'll see there is some evidence
> that Facelets performs a decent amount faster than JSP. Also,
> there was a JavaOne presentation with Jacob Hookom and Adam Winer
> with some performance benchmarks showing Facelets outperforming
> JSP. I believe all JavaOne presentations are now online on the
> java.net <http://java.net> website. The title was something like
> "Ajax done right.".
>
> HTH,
> *
> Adam Brod*/
> Product Development Team/
>
> *Colin Chalmers <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>*
>
> 07/26/2006 02:07 PM
> Please respond to
> "MyFaces Discussion" <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>
>
>
> To
> MyFaces Discussion < [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> cc
>
> Subject
> Facelets
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've recently just *discovered* facelets.
>
> This has probably come just at the right time. After choosing the JSF
> path approx. a year ago our Java developers have gained much valuable
> experience but alas our design boys keep resisting due to the lack of
> freedom they have when working with default JSF. The advent of
> facelets
> and the templating possibilities has renewed their enthousiasm and we
> have them back on board :-)
>
> However....I'm worried that by choosing facelets we'll be riding that
> bleeding edge wave again with all it's up's & downs. Great for
> POC's but
> bad when you have a strict deadline.
>
> My question is really if there are many others using facelets, what
> their experience is and specifically how it performs??
>
> THX
>
> Colin
>
>Disclaimer: This electronic mail and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email, and destroy all copies of this email and any attachments. Thank you.
>
>
>
>
>
Disclaimer: This electronic mail and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email, and destroy all copies of this email and any attachments. Thank you.
