On 8/18/06, Jeff Bischoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, I think this was said in error. I don't think 1.1.2 is
> interchangeable with newer versions. Maybe I'm wrong, but the errors
> I've seen don't seem to paint that picture
I think you're probably right - how could it be compatible with both
Tomahawk 1.1.2 AND 1.1.3(and greater)? The classes either moved to their
new locations or they didn't. I guess he meant to say what you have
said, that they would be interchangeable AFTER 1.1.2
It's also possible that we planned to be interchangeable after 1.1.2
but we had some issues to work out still. I think we had originally
thought we were interchangable, but it turned out we had subtle
dependencies that weren't originally caught with 1.1.2, like the dummy
form interactions.
