What is your state saving method, server? If so try again with client mode.
Cagatay
On 8/19/06,
Dmitry Y. Shyshkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have had same problem. You may insert follow lines of code at start of
you page. This will create a new view on each request.
<%
FacesContext facesContext = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
UIViewRoot viewRoot =
facesContext.getApplication().getViewHandler().createView(facesContext,
request.getServletPath());
facesContext.setViewRoot(viewRoot);
%>
Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> Search for "facelets"
>
> :-)
>
> But if you're really stuck with JSPs, then I'd recommend searching the
> container documentation for the ability to turn off caching. This is
> a JSP compilation issue rather than a JSF issue.
>
> On 8/18/06, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have had a problem for a while and I would appreciate a hint regarding
>> which words I should use with google to find the solution :)
>>
>> I do iterative development of JSF in JSP-pages, and I have found that
>> apparently the view built in the page is somehow cached, and that cache
>> is not correctly invalidated when I change e.g. an attribute or add an
>> extra component deep down in the view. I have found the work around to
>> use an id-attribute on the h:form and just increment it as a serial
>> number, which apparently invalidates the whole content and force it to
>> be rebuilt.
>>
>> What I would LIKE it to happen is that nothing is kept in the cache for
>> the page what so ever if the JSP-file is recompiled, so that if I change
>> something it is just a save-in-eclipse, reload-in-browser issue. I'd be
>> happy to wait a bit longer for the view to be reconstructed.
>>
>> My guess is that either nobody else but me has this burning desire, or -
>> much more likely - that I do not know the term :) I tried to skim the
>> headers of this list, but there are many messages and nothing jumped out
>> at me. I have also looked at the Wiki and done many searches, so I
>> think I have at least tried :) What should I do now?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Thorbjørn
>>
>
