I have had a look at A4J the last week, it looks really very promising!
The main point i was aware of, is that it`s very easy to use. Maybe there is a lack of functionality because it is a young project, but i would prefer this one for ajaxing the next jsf-web-app. To my mind, 1.) should work definitely. I am sure that there is no support for 2.) I have also doubts that 3.) will work. Seems that you have to take in mind to build/use some ajax components. cheers, Gerald On 8/22/06, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been using AjaxAnywhere and although like it, would recommend trying A4J instead. AA is limited in its functionality for custom components. It requries you to have SPAN elements in your HTML which can cause a lot of CSS pain if your UI is based on a lot of complex layouts. It is does not have many of the properties and controls that are built into A4J (ajax'd commands for example). The only concern I'd have with A4J is stability with MyFaces and inline JavaScript questions. It may have no issues at all, I would just want to do some research myself being jumping in head first. On 8/22/06, Jurgen Lust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > We are debating between Ajax4JSF or Trinidad (adf faces). > > Have you looked at AjaxAnywhere? We have been using this on the last > couple of JSF projects we did, and it has proved to be quite stable and > quite powerful. Also it is very easy to 'upgrade' an existing > application to AJAX with this library. > > I am actually also very interested to hear people's experiences with > Ajax4JSF, which seems very promising. > > Jurgen > >
-- Gerald Müllan Schelleingasse 2/11 1040 Vienna, Austria 0043 699 11772506 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
