Hi Gerald
I'm not familiar with maven but it looks quit interesting and fit (I think so) exactly my needs. I will have a look at maven. Regards Matthias -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Gerald Müllan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 15. September 2006 11:03 An: MyFaces Discussion Betreff: Re: Re: Start project? Ok, so then have a look at Exadel. You can create a skeleton jsf-web app at the beginning when starting with a new project. And sure, it`s not a need to use all the tools coming with Exadel; Just use the plain editors :) If you are a bit familiar with maven2 (to get the myfaces archetype this is also not a need) you can also have a look at: http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/MyFaces_Archetypes_for_Maven Here is described how to build a myfaces skeleton with maven2, without any burden of editors. cheers, Gerald On 9/15/06, Mosimann Matthias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Gerald > > Let me rant a bit. > > Thank you for your answer. Well my personally prefered approach ist the > buttom up approach (study first the tecnical things up to klick-klick tools) > and not the top down approach (klick-klick tools to the tecnical things). It > was mostly the better choose. > > But some of the tools generate you some usefull project skeletons ... and > thats what I'm looking for in a first phase as a JSF beginner. I'm not > looking for a full gui support eclipse plugin, where I spend half of time > klick my application togehter (I do not say this is the absolutly worst way). > > In my personally view of JSF, this is one great goal of JSF, to have some > cool klick-klick tools that supports the developers to create a web > application with a gui. > > regards > Matthias > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Gerald Müllan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. September 2006 10:42 > An: MyFaces Discussion > Betreff: Re: Re: Start project? > > Hi, > > you can also use MyEclipse or Exadel, both have an license agreement where > you can develop with a good environment under a free license. > > However, it is not the most worse idea to learn JSF with the help of not too > many tools. > > cheer, > > Gerald > > On 9/14/06, Mosimann Matthias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi everyone > > > > I hope I don't bother you. > > > > So what is then you prefered development envirement? Eclipse don't have any > > support ... well it has but it is not working correct and the plugin is > > still in development. I'm interested using eclipse anyway. Should I start > > simply with a dynamic web project? > > > > Regards > > Matthias > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Werner Punz > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. September 2006 18:00 > > An: [email protected] > > Betreff: Re: Start project? > > > > Christoph Lassner schrieb: > > > Yes, it is possible, but connected to quite some bits of work > > > (because u have to use other components, etc.). You should have a > > > closer look at the components you need and then decide for a > > > framework. However, like I said, if you really want to change your > > > framework in some time, it will be possible. > > > > > > Regards > > > Chris > > > > > > > > Besides that there is an ongoing work to reduce the incompatibilities > > between the two codebases, in most cases it now should be possible to mix > > both component sets without too much problems. > > > > But you have to go for the nightly builds to be fully able to do it, the > > last stable versions still had major issues, which have been cleared up a > > few weeks ago. > > > > > > > -- > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
