Thanks,
Marc
On 10/5/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Can you add that as a comment to the issue?
Thanks,
regards,
Maritn
On 10/5/06, Marcus Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, I have tried a MyFaces portlet on GridSphere 2.2.X and that series has
> a fix for this bug. So I believe that this has been fixed in GridSphere and
> is no longer an issue.
>
> Marc
>
>
> On 10/5/06, Martin Marinschek < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I went ahead and put it to resolved right now.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 10/5/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Did you comment on the bug first?
> > >
> > > users can't close bugs, but one of the developers will eventually
> > > close it out if you put a clear comment on it.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 10/4/06, Scott O'Bryan < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hey everyone,
> > > >
> > > > I'm new to the MyFaces list. Most of my work at this point as been on
> > > > the Trinidad incubator project. As I am very familiar with portals
> and
> > > > was looking at making some enhancements to the Bridge Portlet in order
> > > > to solve some issues with Trinidad, I decided to take a quick gander
> at
> > > > some of the MyFaces issues to see if I can help solve some of those
> > > > issues as well.
> > > >
> > > > Issue Jira issue MYFACES-1358 is not a problem with the MyFaces Portal
> > > > Bridge, rather it's an issue with the GridSphere Portal's
> implementation
> > > > of JSR-168. The GridShphere portal does not return a valid namespace
> > > > according to the JSR-168 API specification for
> > > > RenderRequest.getNamespace () which clearly states:
> > > >
> > > > "The value returned by this method should be prefixed or appended to
> > > > elements, such as _javascript_ variables or function names, to ensure
> they
> > > > are unique in the context of the portal page."
> > > >
> > > > Apparently the GridSphere Portal returns a namespace that contains
> > > > characters like "#" which are not sufficient for this purpose.
> > > > Namespaces need to be valid as both a prefix AND a suffix to element
> > > > id's, _javascript_ variables, and function names as defined by the W3C
> and
> > > > ECMA.
> > > >
> > > > What is the process for closing or returning this bug. Is there one?
> > > >
> > > > Scott O'Bryan
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
