On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 14:14 +0300, Jana Parvanova wrote:
> I am just trying to evaluate a similar solution for a new project.
> So far we have tried using MyFaces, ajax4jsf and Rico 
> (http://openrico.org/rico/demos.page);
> 
> The approach was:
> - use Rico for drag-and-drop (quite easy to use and extend)
> - use ajax4jsf to reflect changes to the underlying model without submitting 
> the whole page
> 
> The whole thing worked rather smoothly (at least at first sight).
> Let me know if you want more details or sample code.
Yeah, it would be really nice to have such cool components/samples in
the wiki!

Cheers,
Martin


> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Bohringer Jochen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 11:38 AM
> Subject: Extending Treetable component with drag & drop
> 
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> > we have to build a new web application containing a treetable showing 
> > hierarchical relations between organizational units as a tree column and 
> > other data for the organizational units in the other columns of the table 
> > like unit name, address and so on.
> >
> > This can be accomplished using the treeTable component of tomahawk or the 
> > treeTable component delivered by Trinidad.
> >
> > But an additional requirement to showing the data is to let the 
> > hierarchical structure of the tree be modified by the user.
> >
> > Our idea is to let the user drag one of the rows in the table and drop it 
> > onto another row in the table. The dragged row and its child nodes should 
> > be attached as a child node to the row it was dropped on.
> > These modifications in the tree should be visible on the client side but 
> > should also be reflected in the data model on the server, because the 
> > modifications have to be persisted to the database.
> >
> > So my questions are:
> >
> > - Is there already a component available which shows a treetable and has 
> > drag & drop support?
> > - If we have to extend an existing component, what is easier to extend? 
> > Trinidad Treetable or Tomahawk treetable? If we extend one of the 
> > components it would be our aim to integrate this extension into the 
> > existing component to share this extension with others as an optional 
> > feature which can be controlled by tag attributes.
> > - Is it a good choice to combine ajax4jsf with Trinidad or tomahawk?
> > - If we have to realize drag & drop ourselves: Is dojo a good choice for 
> > this? Is it a good idea to integrate it ourselves or should we use 
> > something like jMaki?
> > - Which version of JSF should we use in an application starting in 
> > development now and releasing the first version containing the drag&drop 
> > treetable end of the year? 1.1 or 1.2?
> >
> > And last but not least: We want to use facelets as view handler and tomcat 
> > 5.5 as servlet container :-)
> >
> > Thanks for reading this bunch of questions.
> > Any hints regarding some or all of my questions would be greatly 
> > appreciated!
> >
> > Regards
> > Jochen
> >
> > 
> 
-- 
Martin Grotzke
Online    http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to