dude. Tiles support was added, when tiles was still cool and <jsp:include> was not the funniest (or still is) for doing that.
now we have facelets, why tiles ? :) We should keep it for backward fun, but I am def. +1 on @deprecated JS less :) sure +1 on that. you are not the only one ;) back to alaska ? or still in india ? -M On 10/26/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Matze, Am I the only one who feels the Tiles support and javascriptless feature should officially be retired ? To my knowledge these haven't worked well since the good ol' 1.0.9 days :) Dennis Byrne >-----Original Message----- >From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 01:40 PM >To: 'MyFaces Discussion' >Subject: Re: status of tiles support > >it is this clazz > >org.apache.myfaces.tomahawk.application.jsp.JspTilesViewHandlerImpl > >To be honest, you should try Facelets instead of Tiles for templating a JSF app > >-Matthias > >On 10/26/06, Michael Südkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I wonder what is the status of the tiles support? >> >> The myfaces-examples are still at version 1.1.1 and the included tiles >> web-app will not run with the the 1.1.3 libs (and probably also not with >> 1.1.4) (java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: >> org.apache.myfaces.application.jsp.JspTilesViewHandlerImpl). >> >> The wiki topic at http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Tiles_and_JSF is also not >> up to date. >> >> Can anyone help me how to set it up? >> >> Michael >> >> > > >-- >Matthias Wessendorf >http://tinyurl.com/fmywh > >further stuff: >blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf >mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >
-- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
