Matthias,
I agree, more components does not make for a better spec. The place for
neat components are libraries such as Tomahawk. The last thing I want in
JSF 2.0 are some funky ajax-ified components, but rather more native
support for ajax across the board. I get the feeling that products like
ajax4jsf would have a lot fewer bugs if the JSF lifecycle provided
better hooks for what they are trying to do.
By the way, I noticed that Jacob refers to you as "the great Matthias."
Either you've been leading legions of soldiers to conquer neighboring
countries, or you're developing quite the reputation in the JSF world.
...then again, it could be the beer talking. ;)
Regards,
Jeff Bischoff
Kenneth L Kurz & Associates, Inc.
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
I expect framework extensions from jsf6 (see [1]) and perhaps an
client side api.
But, please no random-components and no calendar and no xxx-components.
Let's work on the API / Framework, but on *blowing up* the sepc with
new components.
-M
[1] http://www.jroller.com/page/mwessendorf?entry=jsf_version_6
On 11/1/06, Jeff Bischoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sounds painful.
I really hope that a future version of the JSF spec integrates AJAX more
directly into the framework. For now, I am seeing more ajax components
showing up in Tomahawk/Sandbox and that at least is something.
Regards,
Jeff Bischoff
Kenneth L Kurz & Associates, Inc
