Well how do I subscribe to the mailing list? The subscribe links aren't links here - http://incubator.apache.org/adffaces/trinidad-build/mail-lists.html
Is it the standard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Aneesha On 11/16/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
mailing list works, I am on check the trinidad wiki for nbuilds (from continuum) http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad On 11/16/06, Aneesha Govil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, I am aware of the Oracle connection. When I was evaluating what to use > for my project, I could not find a download location anywhere on the > incubator. Only source was available. The mailing list did not work either. > It looked very useful from documentation et al. > > So how do I go about it if I want to use it? Anything like nightly builds > and where can I find them? > > Thanks a lot. > Regards, > Aneesha > > > On 11/16/06, Gerald Müllan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sure, think about the history before trinidad has come to incubator. > > It was oracle internal, so they have already used it in their webapps. > > > > Apart from this, the usage of trinidad is emerging, also in some > > real-world web-apps. > > > > cheers, > > > > Gerald > > > > On 11/16/06, Aneesha Govil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is it alright to use Trinidad while it is still in the incubator? > > > > > > Aneesha > > > > > > On 11/16/06, Martin Marinschek < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > He should definitely take the Trinidad component set for high > > > > performance requirements, with this, you're in the same region as > > > > Struts for performance (probably better - cause if you do it yourself, > > > > you won't get the same optimized state-saving as is implemented in > > > > Trinidad). > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > > > On 11/15/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Ok, before anyone is falling down the chair because I ask this > question. > > > > > Here we go. A friend of mine is looking for a struts replacement > > > > > framework covering extranet sites. > > > > > > > > > > Well here we go, my experience with jsf in the past is, that it was > not > > > > > too suitable for extranet, but is a perfect choice for intranet > sites. > > > > > The reason, higher overhead than plain lean frameworks only covering > a > > > > > minimalistic approach. > > > > > > > > > > The situation has changed however, facelets give a huge performance > > > > > boost due to good caching. > > > > > But I lack experience, I know several bigger intranet installations, > > > > > but extranet is a fully different beast. > > > > > > > > > > So my question how good does jsf scale nowadays in those cases. > > > > > Does anyone have any experience or samples? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > > Courses in English and German > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > Courses in English and German > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
