Yes, that should ideally be the case with perfect code.

In practice, I found that trying to use the Sun RI 1.1 had much poorer
error reporting and it was difficult to determine what caused a
particular error.

On 12/4/06, Bharath Belagodu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Appreciate all the responses in regarding to this topic. The component
base is tomahawk but once tomahawk and myfaces separated out as
different build, it probably has minimal impact if myfaces or Sun RI is
chosen.

Will update the group after few more findings. Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Holger Prause [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 2:30 PM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: Sun RI vs MyFaces

Aneesha Govil schrieb:
> Apart from whatever has already been said..
>
> I did some research when we were deciding this for my project. Though
> I don't have references now, I read at a few places that there are
> lesser issues with MyFaces and get fixed/support easily as compared to

> Sun's RI. Not sure if that is correct though. I have no personal
> experience with Sun's RI.
>
> Aneesha
>
> On 12/1/06, *Bharath Belagodu* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>     Appreciate the responses,
>
>     There isn't much discussion on using one as suppose to the other
>     on the
>     net. Only one mail archive informed me of some differences,
>
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/struts-user/200505.mbox/%3C32FF
>     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>     Since both implementations adhere to the spec, there shouldn't be
>     much
>     difference except for java docs, community support etc. I'd
consider
>     performance as another criteria but we won't know till we hit it
hard
>     with some regression testing.
>
>     MyFaces has javascript rendering which isn't part of Sun (as of
Aug
>     2005),
>
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-users/200508.mbox/%3C00
>     [EMAIL PROTECTED] %3E
>
>     Probably sun has better chance of catching up to the spec than
>     MyFaces?
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: Holger Prause [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>     Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 10:52 AM
>     To: MyFaces Discussion
>     Subject: Re: Sun RI vs MyFaces
>
>     Bharath Belagodu schrieb:
>     >
>     >     What would one prefer for the base RI, Sun or MyFaces and
why
>     >     would one want to choose over another. We use tomahawk
>     components
>     >     and MyFaces as of now, why should we use MyFaces as suppose
to
>     >     Sun? I read thro' many blogs, email postings but didn't find
>     >     strong reasons going with one or the other. Only one article
>     back
>     >     fro 2005 suggested using Sun RI but that might be outdated.
Any
>     >     suggestions?
>     >
>     well if u want to use the blueprint solution catalog i would use
Suns
>     RI.
>     But with tomahawk theres no need to i think.
>
>
 From my point of view it depend on the
<http://dict.leo.org/ende?lp=ende&p=/gQPU.&search=environment>environmen
t
u have,what additional libraries u want to use(for example if u plant to

use tomahawk components if would prefer myfaces)
then u can decide.

For example if you deploy your applications on glassfish, i would
suggest Sun RI
For my enviroment, i use myfaces.(JBoss Server).
In fact i cant get Sun RI working in my environment(tried a lot , i
maybe made mistakes but it just took too long)

Well from my experience if u get one of the solutions (myfaces or ri)
working , it dont matter what implementation you use.

Hope i could help a bit making a decision.

Bye,

Holger



Reply via email to