I'd use NO jsp and tomahawk and trinidad
:-)
I wanted to say:
no jsp.
Only Facelets AND tom. and trin
-M
(perhaps we can add a [troll] to the subject now ?)
:-D
Just my $0.02
-M
On 12/14/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/14/06, Aneesha Govil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I was looking for information on JBoss Seam and posted a thread on the
> JBoss Seam forum. I would like you to see [1]. I do not understand why they
> have such an opinion. What are your thoughts on this?
> >
> > Does anybody have any experience on using tomahawk on JBoss? Any
> tips/pointers on whether anything might go wrong?
>
> Did you try what Gavin suggested ("search this forum") in the thread you
> referenced?
>
> The Tomahawk implementors have made some decisions that I wouldn't choose
> myself (example: why should saving state be something that the *page
> author* does with <t:saveState> instead of letting the application
> developer, or the framework he/she is using, take careof it?), but the best
> source of information on real problems would seem to be people who have
> tried the combination and found issues. It seems like there are more than a
> few such threads in the JBoss Seam forum archives.
>
> > Thanks,
> > Aneesha
> >
> > [1]
> http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993759#3993759
> >
>
>
> Craig
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
