Jeff, thanks for your response. We are migrating from version 1.0.10. (It was impossible to migrate before this)
I simply replaced myfaces-api-1.1.4.jar with myfaces-api-1.1.5-SNAPSHOT.jar and myfaces-impl-1.1.4.jar with myfaces-impl-1.1.5-SNAPSHOT.jar and it worked. The only thing which remains worrisome are the following "not found" lines (these are new) from the startup log: [06-12-21 13:39:08:515 EST] 55255525 FacesConfigur I org.apache.myfaces.config.FacesConfigurator Reading standard config org/apache/myfaces/resource/standard-faces-config.xml [06-12-21 13:39:09:156 EST] 55255525 FacesConfigur I org.apache.myfaces.config.FacesConfigurator Reading config wsjar:file:/D:/Systprod/dev/wsad/workspace_L3/STWebLibreService/WebContent/WEB-INF/lib/tomahawk-1.1.3.jar!/META-INF/faces-config.xml [06-12-21 13:39:10:015 EST] 55255525 FacesConfigur I org.apache.myfaces.config.FacesConfigurator Reading config /WEB-INF/faces-config.xml [06-12-21 13:39:11:234 EST] 55255525 FacesConfigur I org.apache.myfaces.config.FacesConfigurator MyFaces-package : myfaces-api not found. [06-12-21 13:39:11:234 EST] 55255525 FacesConfigur I org.apache.myfaces.config.FacesConfigurator MyFaces-package : myfaces-impl not found. [06-12-21 13:39:11:250 EST] 55255525 FacesConfigur I org.apache.myfaces.config.FacesConfigurator MyFaces-package : tomahawk-sandbox not found. [06-12-21 13:39:11:250 EST] 55255525 FacesConfigur I org.apache.myfaces.config.FacesConfigurator MyFaces-package : tomahawk not found. [06-12-21 13:39:13:593 EST] 55255525 FacesConfigur I org.apache.myfaces.config.FacesConfigurator Serialization provider : class org.apache.myfaces.shared_impl.util.serial.DefaultSerialFactory Any ideas on what those lines may indicate? Other than that, thanks again for your help. -----Message d'origine----- De : Jeff Bischoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : jeudi 21 décembre 2006 11:44 À : MyFaces Discussion Objet : Re: Migration to 1.1.4 problem Hmm what are you migrating "from", another JSF implementation or non-JSF framework? And are you interested in the Myfaces JSF implementation, the Tomahawk components library, or both? I think it will be much simpler for you to take a look at the example applications. Sadly, they are not part of the current release (probably why you couldn't find them) but you can download them from the nightlies here [1]. Just get the tomahawk-examples-1.1.5-SNAPSHOT-bin. Hopefully the examples will make it back to the official releases. Also, the new preferred way to start a myfaces project (with all the correct dependencies!) is to use the Maven Archetype from the wiki [2]. [1] http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/ [2] http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/MyFaces_Archetypes_for_Maven Regards, Jeff Bischoff Kenneth L Kurz & Associates, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We are having difficulties migrating to 1.1.4 version of myFaces. We > have gone through the web site and the wiki, to no avail. We are not sure > which jars are important? > > We have found references to the following jars throughout: > > Sandbox.jar > Tomahawk-1.1.5-SNAPSHOT.jar (which I cant find anywhere) > Tomahawk-sandbox-1.1.5-SNAPSHOT.jar (which I also cannot find > anywhere) > > There seems to be a well-intended page for people like ourselves at: > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Library_dependencies ...but it appears > to be a few versions behind. > > My question is the following: Would it be possible to list all the > jars required to make a simple Hello World with the latest version of > MyFaces? Also including both a valid web.xml and faces-config.xml? > > We are using Rational Application Developper 6.0.1, and WebSphere 5x. > Furthermore, we have changed our classloading to "Application" and to > the PARENT_LAST approach (as suggested on the wiki). > > > For those of you who are running your code in RAD, this is the error > code we get as the web app launches: SRVE0054E. The solution, > according to IBM is to use fully packaged names when declaring > exception types in our web.xml (which we do already, of course). > > Any help/suggestions/insights (even a good joke at this point) would > be appreciated. > > Thanks > > >
