I also need to return a new list of children with size = 0
This just seemed like a horrible hack.
And I was just wondering if it was supposed to work like this or if this is
a bug?
Does anyone know how I can get the source to the core library 1.1.13?
My coworker used that version but did not get the source.
thanks
On 1/2/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is some weird code in the tree renderer that I saw when I was
trying to customize my own tree. In your case the weird code is a bug
(I didn't look to far into this and am going from memory, so I may be
mistaken). The code is something like:
for (int i = 0; i < node.getChildrenCount(); i++)
{
if (treeWalker.next())
...
}
if you look at the code you will see the for loop is completely
useless, all that is needed is the treeWalker.next() call. Check out
the source for:
org.apache.myfaces.custom.tree2.HtmlTreeRenderer.encodeTree()
If you have debugging set up, debug through that method.
What is probably happening is that your children count is returning 1
but the walker skips it because it is a leaf node and the state may
become invalid at that point.
As a work-around, return "true" for isLeaf and "0" for
getChildrenCount() to make sure your child node is not rendered.
On 1/2/07, kal stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was wondering if this is valid or if I am doing something wrong here.
>
> I have a node, that has children, but I don't want those children to be
> displayed in some situations.
>
> So in those situations I return true in isLeaf()
>
> When this happens It displays the tree with the bottom elements chopped
off.
>
> So lets say I have a tree with 3 elements
>
> 1 Node 1 (is a leaf)
> 2 Node 2 is a child of Node 1 and should not be displayed
> 3 Node 3 is any node at the same level as Node 1
>
> Then Node 3 is not displayed.
>
> I am using myfaces 1.1.13
>
> I was going to look through the bug forum, but I could not figure out
how to
> search through it.
>
> Thanks
>
>
