Hello, On 1/23/07, lightbulb432 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Which of the two should I use? They seem like they're pretty similar, as Trinidad came to be as a donation of ADF Faces I believe...what is confusing is that there are some missing components in Trinidad (like those relating to menus), but Trinidad is also in "incubator" mode in Apache.
Menus are there, just renamed, check the following URLs: http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/from_ADF_to_Trinidad http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad_renaming Of course I wouldn't want to start using something that may not even end up
getting approved by Apache.
It's very unlikely to happen. Is ADF Faces "free" to use? I think it is with an Oracle AS, but I'm not sure. What do you use, and what's the advantage to choosing one over the other? Trinidad has a JSF 1.2 branch that will never exists with ADF Faces. ADF Faces won't ever be updated again by Oracle, they will forward all requests to Trinidad. In fact Oracle is building a next gen product using Trinidad code base (see mailing list archives for more details, or do some Googling for ADF RIA which I believe is the product in question) Trinidad also has many bug fixes and nice improvement, like charts,improved train and built in menu model for example. Trinidad also support more skinning hooks as well as important skinning functionalities, namely -inhibit You can contribute to make Trinidad better should you find a bug or post a new JIRA issue, those often get fixed quite fast when they're major. Regards, ~ Simon --
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ADF-Faces-vs-Trinidad-tf3062439.html#a8515917 Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
