Just a short update. I tried to add trinidad to my application (myfaces 1.1.5 + tomahawk 1.1.5 + trinidad m1) , but the JSCookmenu stopped working with the error: 'elements.jscook_action' is null or not an object. There are also other things that are not quite right (I am also using shale 1.0.3) and I don't have time to investigate.
I am afraid that there is more work to be done to integrate both libraries. Jay Balunas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Using the <tr:table> was one option that I considered but the timing with my release is too tight to change out all of that. So I'm going to look into changing to the <tr:table> after we ship. I did check out the facesgoodies page while working through the integration. Thanks for the advice - and I'll give it a shot later. Jay On 2/2/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:Hey Jay, I suggest to use the <tr:table> from Trinidad instead of the Tomahawk one. The Trinidad table has *build-in* support für paging. no need for a special *pager* component (scroller) Perhaps you want to look here: http://code.google.com/p/facesgoodies/ which is a kickstart app for using Trinidad. I am working on adding support for Tomahawk there as well Thanks, Matthias On 2/1/07, Jay Balunas <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > I have just gotten done attempting the same thing. I am using Myfaces, > Tomahawk, and facelets for am existing project. I wanted to use Trinidad as > well. > > I was unsuccessful in getting them to play nicely. At first there was an > issue with dashes ("-") in component IDs I believe Trinidad uses component > IDs as javascript variables and that was causing errors. After changing > those I found that there is a bug in tomahawk (bug #777) in the > <t:dataScroller> that caused issues with Trinidad. If you do a search you > will find other bugs related to tomahawk and Trinidad. > > The breaker for me was that my dataTable uses the attribute > "forceIdIndexFormula" and the value uses "-" in its name. Trinidad was then > using that as a javascript variable name and caused many errors. > > When I get a little time I am going to investigate this more, and see if I > can help out the cause. I think that these two libraries are powerful and > would be great together. > > If you learn anything more, or see issues with my findings please let me > know. > > -Jay > > > On 1/31/07, Costa Basil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just to be precise, in both my messages when I said myfaces I meant > myfaces core + tomahawk. I extensively use tomahawk in my project. > > > > I am looking to use some of the trinidad components, and I want to know > which versions of myfaces core & tomahawk trinidad is compatible with. I > found this link but it doesn't specify trinidad: > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/CompatibilityMatrix > > > > > > > > > > Costa Basil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Which version of myfaces is compatible with the current Trinidad snapshot? > > > > Thanks again > > > > ________________________________ > Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the > boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail > > > > > > ________________________________ > Now you can have a huge leap forward in email: get the new Yahoo! Mail. > > > > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com --------------------------------- Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! Answers.
