Anyone else have an insight on this issue?
-----Original Message----- From: Nael Ramadan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:56 PM To: 'MyFaces Discussion' Subject: RE: jsf 508 accessibility requirement satisfaction and use of <label for=..> tag. Maybe I have not explained myself correctly. What if I am doing this: <h:selectOneRadio value="#{BeanName.readioButtonSelected}"> <f:selectItems value="#{BeanName.radioButtonList}"/> </h:selectOneRadio> What you are suggesting below, will not work unless I misunderstood again. -----Original Message----- From: Simon Kitching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:34 PM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: jsf 508 accessibility requirement satisfaction and use of <label for=..> tag. When you get a reply you should really read it properly. As I said, and as described here, a label tag can wrap another tag in which case "for" is not needed: http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_label.asp <label> a label <input type="checkbox" name="cb1"> </label> <div> just some text <input type="checkbox" name="cb2"> </div> Clicking on the text "a label" will toggle the checkbox, ie the text really is a label. Clicking on "just some text" will NOT toggle the checkbox. However if you want a label that is not adjacent to the input control, then do: <h:inputText id="input1" .../> some other stuff <h:outputLabel for="input1" value="labeltext"/> See also: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-reply-to-emails-tf3182877.html Nael Ramadan wrote: > The "for" attribute enables the target component to be selected via its > label. For example: > > <hr>Select Type version of MyFaces </hr> > <label for="comp_id1">Version 1</label><input type="radio" name="comp_id1"> > <label for="comp_id2">Version 2</label><input type="radio" name="comp_id2"> > <label for="comp_id3">Version 3</label><input type="radio" name="comp_id3"> > > By clicking on "Version 1" label, the radio button (with name = comp_id1 ) > is selected. > > By clicking on "Version 2" label, the radio button (with name = comp_id2 ) > is selected. > > By clicking on "Version 3" label, the radio button (with name = comp_id3 ) > is selected. > > > This is for html. By definition, a label serves no purpose without its for > attribute. > > How can this be done in JSF? > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Simon Kitching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 2:57 PM > To: MyFaces Discussion > Subject: Re: jsf 508 accessibility requirement satisfaction and use of > <label for=..> tag. > > Nael Ramadan wrote: >> 1. >> >> Dear listner, >> >> My JSF pages must satisify 508 accessibility requirement through the use >> of the html label tag. >> >> In html, you wrap the html component (i.e. <input type=radio >> id="id_name" ..>) with the <label for="id_name"> .. </label> tag where >> the "id" links the label with the component. This allows ease of >> selection where users would just have to click on the label of the html >> component in order to select the component. >> >> So how is this achieved in JSF? >> >> When JSF renders an html equivalent components (i.e. >> h:selectOneRadioButton) into html, the component is surrounded >> automatically with <label>..</label> tag but without the "for" attribute. >> >> How can I get around this issue such that I can control the <label> and >> not the JSF rendering engine? >> >> I tried surrounding the component with <h:outputLabel for=..> .. >> </h:outputLabel> but JSF pretty much seems to ignore it. >> >> Do I need to create my own custom JSF component? >> > > When a <label> tag *wraps* am HTML tag then there is *no need* for a > "for" attribute - the tag the label refers to is obvious. This is > standard HTML, not JSF-specific. I'm sure your 508 spec does NOT require > the "for" attribute if the label tag wraps the target tag. > > If the label tag cannot wrap its target tag for any reason, then (and > only then) the "for" attribute is needed. > > http://java.sun.com/javaee/javaserverfaces/1.1_01/docs/tlddocs/index.html > > Regards, > > Simon >
