Alright. I'm working off of the Release Candidates now, so once they are released and I've tested my taglib entries out more, I'll update both wikis.

On a side note, I do need to test these more before reposting them anywhere. Specifically, I still can't get s:selectItems to work in facelets. (It is in sandbox for me, since I am using the release candidates) Did the class name change at all when it was promoted? Perhaps it was in another package, and I need to revert that?

Hmm maybe someone other than Mike can comment, as I'm sure by now I'm giving him gray hairs. ;)

Mike Kienenberger wrote:
I see my answer wasn't clear.   Sorry.  Yes, that's what I understood
you to mean.

After thinking about it a little more, my suggestion would be to
update for the current release.   Anyone using the current trunk
should be knowledgeable enough to handle the differences between trunk
and release.

On 2/8/07, Jeff Bischoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike,

Sorry for the confusion.

I have these tags, and already added them to my appropriate taglibs. But
I wanted to update the wiki to include them also. I just didn't know
whether to update the wiki to reflect the current release or the current
trunk. :)

Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> Jeff, I add tags as I need them. That way I always know that they work.
> Actually, I think I have tags for convertNumber
>
>    <tag>
>        <tag-name>convertDateTime</tag-name>
>        <converter>
>
> <converter-id>org.apache.myfaces.custom.convertDateTime.DateTimeConverter</converter-id>
>
>        </converter>
>    </tag>
>
> I have selectItems in my tomahawk config file:
>
>    <tag>
>        <tag-name>selectItems</tag-name>
>        <component>
>
> <component-type>org.apache.myfaces.UISelectItems</component-type>
>        </component>
>    </tag>
>
> Andrew's tool can also be useful.   I think there's a similar tool
> already checked into Myfaces (pulled over from Trinidad) as well.
>
> The promotion between sandbox and tomahawk definitely causes issues
> and is probably the best reason for resolving
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-79.
>
>
> On 2/8/07, Jeff Bischoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks Mike, I see your changes. :)
>>
>> There are a few more sandbox tags not listed on the facelets wiki (only >> listed on our wiki, beyond the tomahawk one). Think I should add them to >> this facelets wiki? I don't want to mistakenly add something that's been
>> promoted. Examples: convertDateTime, convertNumber
>>
>> Then there is selectItems, which was recently promoted. It's currently
>> in our wiki's sandbox section, and not in either of the major taglib
>> sections. Not sure which one to add it to. Stable releases have this
>> component in sandbox, the trunk has it in tomahawk.
>>
>> I'm willing to make these changes myself, just wanted to check before
>> screwing it up for somebody else. Do we normally keep these wikis
>> current for the trunk or the latest release?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jeff Bischoff
>> Kenneth L Kurz & Associates, Inc.
>>
>> Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>> > I stand corrected.  It's not there.  Weird.
>> >
>> > I've realphabetized the sandbox taglib file and added subForm.
>> >
>> > On 2/8/07, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>     <tag>
>> >>         <tag-name>subForm</tag-name>
>> >>         <component>
>> >>
>> <component-type>org.apache.myfaces.SubForm</component-type>
>> >> <renderer-type>org.apache.myfaces.SubForm</renderer-type>
>> >>         </component>
>> >>     </tag>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I'm pretty sure it's on the sandbox wiki because I think that's where
>> >> I got it, but I'll double-check.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 2/8/07, Jeff Bischoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > speaking of which, does anybody have the correct taglib tag for
>> >> > s:subform? It's not on either wiki. :)
>> >> >
>> >> > Jeff Bischoff wrote:
>> >> > > That's true Mike, but here's where it gets dangerous. Those tag
>> files
>> >> > > are being copied probably from one of the wikis. At best, they are
>> >> > > complete and accurate for the latest-and-greatest version, i.e.
>> >> the trunk.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Even if that's true, the user of a stable build is still tasked
>> with
>> >> > > figuring out which components were added or promoted since his
>> >> build and
>> >> > > altering the tag files to match. If this is not done, facelets
>> >> does not
>> >> > > seem to complain but simply lets those components fail
>> silently. I'm
>> >> > > going through this process today, as I've noticed some components
>> >> are in
>> >> > > the wrong taglib file. (e.g. s:selectItems)
>> >> > >
>> >> > > So yes, because the project is volunteer, nothing will get done
>> until
>> >> > > somebody decides to do it. But I think that if someone did
>> choose to
>> >> > > tackle this task, their efforts would be quite worthwhile. These
>> >> things
>> >> > > (taglibs, tag handlers, etc) really do belong in the jar itself.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I'm not complaining that nobody has done it yet, just pointing out
>> >> that
>> >> > > I feel it is worth doing. :)
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Regards,
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Jeff Bischoff
>> >> > > Kenneth L Kurz & Associates, Inc.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>> >> > >> The ease-of-use is part of the problem. :-)
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> When it only takes 5 minutes to copy the sandbox and tomahawk tag
>> >> > >> files to your application, and then another 10 to download
>> >> > >> t:updateActionListener, it's really hard to justify spending a
>> week
>> >> > >> trying to figure out how to integrate automatic file generation
>> >> > >> support into MyFaces in a volunteer-driven project.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> On 2/7/07, Jeff Bischoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > >>> Thanks for responding guys.
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>> Really, no official facelets support? That would explain the
>> >> taglib.xml
>> >> > >>> not being bundled. I had wondered about that too. :)
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>> Having been on this mailing list for quite a while, I can tell
>> >> that many
>> >> > >>> other users do use facelets with myfaces and tomahawk - which is
>> >> the big
>> >> > >>> reason why I'm comfortable converting my application to
>> >> facelets. It
>> >> > >>> does involve a few extra steps, and a few things don't work as
>> >> expected,
>> >> > >>> but overall it's not a big switch from the user standpoint.
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>> Well thanks for the code, it does seem to work nicely.
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>> Regards,
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>> Jeff Bischoff
>> >> > >>> Kenneth L Kurz & Associates, Inc.
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>> Andrew Robinson wrote:
>> >> > >>> > I tried to get MyFaces to support Facelets a while ago, but I
>> >> think
>> >> > >>> > the result was something along the line of no tomahawk
>> >> developers want
>> >> > >>> > to bother. So, not being a MyFaces developer and not having
>> the
>> >> > >>> > patience to wait for others to help and me not knowing enough
>> >> about
>> >> > >>> > the auto-generation and other aspects of the build process
>> >> that would
>> >> > >>> > affect this, I decided to make the jsf-comp version which was
>> >> very
>> >> > >>> > easy to get out fast.
>> >> > >>> >
>> >> > >>> > We can hope for a kind volunteer of the MyFaces developer
>> team to
>> >> > >>> > champion facelets support, but until then I guess this will
>> do.
>> >> > >>> >
>> >> > >>> > FYI - I am not trying to put down anyone on the MyFaces team
>> >> > >>> >
>> >> > >>> > On 2/7/07, Jeff Bischoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > >>> >> Hey this tag handler works great!
>> >> > >>> >>
>> >> > >>> >> ...So why hasn't it been donated to Tomahawk? :)
>> >> > >>> >>
>> >> > >>> >> Or is Tomahawk not supposed to have tag handler classes
>> for some
>> >> > >>> reason?
>> >> > >>> >> Andrew? Mike? :)
>> >> > >>> >>
>> >> > >>> >> Thanks for writing it!
>> >> > >>> >>
>> >> > >>> >> Regards,
>> >> > >>> >>
>> >> > >>> >> Jeff Bischoff
>> >> > >>> >> Kenneth L Kurz & Associates, Inc.
>> >> > >>> >>
>> >> > >>> >> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> >> > >>> >> > Thomas,
>> >> > >>> >> >
>> >> > >>> >> > check [1] for more on it (search for updateActionListener),
>> >> > >>> since you
>> >> > >>> >> > need a *taghandler*
>> >> > >>> >> >
>> >> > >>> >> > -M
>> >> > >>> >> >
>> >> > >>> >> >
>> [1]http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Use_Facelets_with_Tomahawk
>> >> > >>> >> >
>> >> > >>> >> > On 2/2/07, Thomas Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > >>> >> >> Hi Aleksandr,
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >> You are right. I do use Facelets. But I can use other
>> t-tags
>> >> > >>> such as
>> >> > >>> >> >> <t:commandLink/> <t:selectOneMenu/> etc. in xHtml and they
>> >> work
>> >> > >>> well.
>> >> > >>> >> >> Besides, I have the followings on the top of my files.
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >> Thanks
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >> Thomas
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
>> >> > >>> >> >>     xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets";
>> >> > >>> >> >>     xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html";
>> >> > >>> >> >>     xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core";
>> >> > >>> >> >>     xmlns:t="http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk";>
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >> Aleksandr Mazur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >> Hi Thomas,
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >> As I see you are  using faceletes. updateActionListener
>> >> should be
>> >> > >>> >> >> presented in tomahawk.taglib.xml. Is it?
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >> Best regards,
>> >> > >>> >> >>  Aleksandr
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>  Thomas Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> > >>> >> >> 02.02.2007 12:14
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >> Please respond to
>> >> > >>> >> >>  "MyFaces Discussion" <[email protected]>
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >> To MyFaces Discussion <[email protected]>
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >> cc
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >> Subject Error by using <t:updateActionListener/>
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >> Hi all,
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>  My code look as follow:
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>  myPage.xHtml
>> >> > >>> >> >>  ***************
>> >> > >>> >> >>  ...
>> >> > >>> >> >>  <t:commandLink
>> >> > >>> >> >>    action="openNewBrowser"
>> >> > >>> >> >>    immediate="true"
>> >> > >>> >> >>    value="Open New Browser"
>> >> > >>> >> >>    target="readMessageWindow">
>> >> > >>> >> >>    <t:updateActionListener property="property"
>> >> > >>> >> >> value="message"></t:updateActionListener>
>> >> > >>> >> >>  </t:commandLink>
>> >> > >>> >> >>  ...
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >> But I get following error when try to open myPage.xHtml.
>> >> What's
>> >> > >>> >> wrong?
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >> <t:updateActionListener> Tag Library supports namespace: >> >> > >>> >> >> http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk, but no tag was defined
>> >> for
>> >> > >>> name:
>> >> > >>> >> >> updateActionListener
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>  Thanks
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>  Thomas
>> >> > >>> >> >>   ________________________________
>> >> > >>> >> > Yahoo! 360° – Bloggen und Leute treffen. Erstellen Sie
>> >> jetzt Ihre
>> >> > >>> >> > eigene Seite – kostenlos!.
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>           ________________________________
>> >> > >>> >> > Yahoo! Messenger -   kostenlos* mit Familie und Freunden
>> >> von PC
>> >> > >>> zu PC
>> >> > >>> >> > telefonieren .
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >>
>> >> > >>> >> >
>> >> > >>> >> >
>> >> > >>> >> >
>> >> > >>> >>
>> >> > >>> >>
>> >> > >>> >>
>> >> > >>> >
>> >> > >>> >
>> >> > >>> >
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>








Reply via email to