I'm not an expert, but the documentation I've read says that
disabled=true doesn't resubmit the form value and that read-only=true
does resubmit the form value.   My guess is that the error message
above should be changed to remove the read-only caveat.

On 3/15/07, Jeff Bischoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I understand that Mike, but shouldn't read-only throw the same error
(judging by the error message)?

I had client-side javascript for disabling elements too, but found it
unwieldy in the context of JSF lifecycle and complex component IDs. I am
much happier having it on the server-side, but when that is too
heavyweight I add some AJAX to lighten up the request.

It's just another option you might want to consider Oliver. By all
means, give Mike's suggestion a try as he generally knows what he is
talking about and it should be a "quicker fix".

Regards,

Jeff Bischoff
Kenneth L Kurz & Associates, Inc.

Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> Jeff, he's doing this with javascript (clientside).   Doing it in a
> JSF-way would move that to server-side.   The best thing to do is to
> make it read-only.
>
> On 3/15/07, Jeff Bischoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Or better yet, disable it in a JSF way - ie, using the "disabled"
>> attribute of the component along with an "immediate" submit.
>>
>> Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>> > JSF expects to get a value back from this component when the form is
>> > submitted.  If you disable the element from javascript, that doesn't
>> > happen.   Instead of disabling it, make it read-only.
>> >
>> > http://webdesign.about.com/od/forms/a/aa071805.htm
>> >
>> > On 3/15/07, Pfau, Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> what is meaning of this message:
>> >>
>> >> "WARNING: There should always be a submitted value for an input if
>> it is
>> >> rendered, its form is submitted, and it is not disabled or read-only
>> >> . Component : <...inputText>"
>> >>
>> >> <...inputText> is an input text field which could be enabled or
>> disabled
>> >> by javascript. I have other input text fields without this message.
>> Any
>> >> idea ?
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Oliver
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>




Reply via email to