nope

anyone tried:
http://www.jsftoolbox.com/products/facelets/index.jsf

On 3/21/07, Stefan Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
exadel does an almost good job with facelets: They handle name-spaces quite
good and can even evaluate and code-assist simple expression (that is, if
you have your managed beans inside the faces-config.xml, which is not the
case with seam) - and now that they have been eaten by jboss (together with
richfaces), things may even get better (and the seam-problems may also
vanish over time).

I don't see so many contenders in the field, but as exadel is painfully slow
from time to time, I'm still looking for alternatives - does anyone know if
netbeans has facelets-support?!

cheers
stf

2007/3/21, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jörn Zaefferer schrieb:
>
> >
> > Now my eclipse-based IDE think I'm editing a JSP and provides content
> > assist for all standard JSF components.
> >
> > The support still isn't as good as for JSPs because I don't provide the
> > IDE with tlds for "custom" tags or components. But I can live with that,
> > facelets makes my work easy enough anyway.
>
> True, the main problem is the lack of a decent xhtml/xmlns support in
> most ides.
> Facelets does not do anything really problematic, it provides xmlns
> tags and it uses xhmtl, thats basically it.
>
> The only thing I can see is that if you use custom attributes in
> your compositions the normal xhtml editors fall flat on their face,
> thats pretty much the only facelet specific thing I can see.
> The main problem is the lousy support of xhtml/xmlns in most editors.
>
>




--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh

further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Reply via email to