LOL. It's an excellent concept in theory, but it really exposes
loopholes in the JSR-168 specification. :) I guess the lesson is that
if you can code to a "known" portal implementation, then you can do some
cool things.. But if you need to be portable, you're kind of screwed
for many of the cases.
Like I say, though, there is hope in the near future. It'll be
interesting to see how it plays out.
Scott
Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
Good points Scott. I haven't worked or even seen a portlet container
that uses different portlet namespaces and IDs, nor did I worked with
WSRP. I still don't quite get what the point of WSRP is anyway...
