Hello!
Ok, I'll add a feature request. Session controller... yes, this is
possible, but very inconvenient. Isn't?
From my point of view - create special session bean to store request
scope variables... grr... Ok, I will try this workaround but
preserveDataModel, imho, is more finest way.
P.S. Is there not only demo application with Tobago, but working
project? With forms, sheets, etc..?
You can add a feature request for soomething like preserveDataModel.
Why don't use session scope controller instance like in the examples?
2007/4/11, Boris Kovalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello!
Hmmm.... this very very distressing. tc:sheet is now useless for me.
Will this changed with next releases?
Also, is there a best practices how to deal with this?
> Hi,
>
> You can't have a request scope sheet value. The value is not stored in
> the UIData, this is was tomahwks preserveDataModel does. The binding
> has nothing to do with this.
>
> Regards,
> Volker
>
> 2007/4/11, Boris Kovalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I'm fully frustrated... Does anybody used request scope bean and
>> tc:sheet with tc:link (or tc:button) for current row selection? May I
>> see working example? Where tc:sheet is populated based on the
value of
>> one of the form fields? I can't get it working with Tobago.... It
seems
>> like PHASE problems.
>>
>> Before: APPLY_REQUEST_VALUES
>> --- getting mailAccounts size = 0
>> After APPLY_REQUEST_VALUES
>> Before: PROCESS_VALIDATION
>> After: PROCESS_VALIDATION
>> Before: UPDATE_MODEL_VALUES
>> After: UPDATE_MODEL_VALUES
>> Before: INVOKE_APPLICATION
>> ---- Oops... mailAccounts are still empty!!!
>> After: INVOKE_APPLICATION
>>
>>
>> With respect,
>> Boris
>>
>>
>
With respect,
Boris
With respect,
Boris
