That sound like a good idea but I still get the same error (Input value is 
required)... I have the following radio button code..:

<h:selectOneRadio value="#{orderBean.ordre.logFortrykk.mottattDokumentS}">
         <f:selectItem itemLabel="OK" itemValue="Yes"/>
         <f:selectItem itemLabel="Ikke OK" itemValue="No"/>
         <s:submitOnEvent for="btnSubmit" event="click" />
</h:selectOneRadio>

And text field...:

<h:inputTextarea cols="100" rows="7" 
required="#{orderBean.ordre.logFortrykk.mottattDokumentS == 'No'}" ... />


But when I click the OK radiobutton, it still complains about the required field


BTJ

On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 10:43:04 -0500
"Qunming Yuan \(Saul\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Just a thought, can you dynamically control the requiredness of your text 
> field base on the choice of your radio button,
> something like:
> 
> required="${backingBean.radiobuttonValue}"
> 
> This way whether the text box is render or required is in sync with the 
> choice of your radio button.
> 
> 
> Saul
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Bjørn T Johansen 
>   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>   Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 10:23 AM
>   Subject: required=true?
> 
> 
>   I have small problem and I was wondering how people get around this...
> 
>   I have a radiobutton with yes or no as the two choices that decides if a 
> text field should be rendered or not (choosing yes
> or no will submit the page)... Also if this text field is rendered, it is a 
> mandatory field and need some input..
> 
>   If I use required = true on the text field, then when the text field is 
> rendered and I choose the other choice of the
>   radiobuttons (that would hide the text field again), I get an error saying 
> that an input is required in the text field (which
> is normally correct but not this time, because I am just trying to hide the 
> text field again)
>   If I use immediate = true, then the value of the radiobutton is not set and 
> the text field is never rendered...
> 
> 
>   I guess this is a normal problem but not sure how to best solve this?
> 
> 
>   Regards,
> 
>   BTJ
> 
>   -- 
>   
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Bjørn T Johansen
> 
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Someone wrote:
>   "I understand that if you play a Windows CD backwards you hear strange 
> Satanic messages"
>   To which someone replied:
>   "It's even worse than that; play it forwards and it installs Windows"
>   
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>   --------------------------------
>   Spam/Virus scanning by CanIt Pro
> 
>   For more information see
>   http://www.kgbinternet.com/SpamFilter.htm
> 
>   To control your spam filter, log in at
>   http://filter.kgbinternet.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   E-mail message checked by PC Tools Spyware Doctor (5.0.0.179)
>   Database version: 5.07080
>   http://www.pctools.com/spyware-doctor/
> 
> 
> 
> E-mail message checked by PC Tools Spyware Doctor (5.0.0.179)
> Database version: 5.07080
> http://www.pctools.com/spyware-doctor/

Reply via email to