Hello,

Is there any chance that the facet in error is not that one? Because it
should work.

On 5/7/07, Francisco Passos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

After moving "rendered" from f:facet to tr:table, the error remains the
same, it complains that the facet can only have one child. What could cause
this?

On 5/7/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The only obvious problem there is that f:facet doesn't support
> "rendered" - Facelets should be complaining.  You have to put
> "rendered" on the table, not the facet.
>
> -- Adam
>
>
> On 5/7/07, Francisco Passos < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I suppose it should indeed work inside of a column, but it isn't.
> >
> > I've tried with a detailStamp like this:
> >
> >     <tr:table value="#{ fichaOperadorBean.attributes}" var="attribute"
> >
> >         <tr:column>
> >             <tr:outputText value="#{attribute.xnomatrb}"/>
> >         </tr:column>
> >         <f:facet name="detailStamp" rendered="#{attribute.xtipdado eq
> 'S' or
> > attribute.xtipdado eq 'L'}">
> >             <tr:table value="#{attribute.attributeData }"
> > var="attributeData">
> >                 <tr:column>
> >                     <tr:outputText value="#{ attributeData.xvalor}" />
> >                 </tr:column>
> >             </tr:table>
> >         </f:facet>
> >     </tr:table>
> >
> > and I got an error: <f:facet> Facet Tag can only have one child
> UIComponent
> >
> > I don't understand, since the facet only has the tr:table. I also
> tried it
> > using a tr:panelGroup with the tr:table in it, but to no avail.
> >
> > What can I do?
> >
> >
> > On 5/6/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hrm.  It is supposed to work inside of a column as well
> > > as a detailStamp...
> > >
> > > -- Adam
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/4/07, Brian Smith < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Try wrapping your nested table inside of a detailStamp facet
> instead of
> > a
> > > > column
> > > >
> > > >     <tr:table value="#{ fichaOperadorBean.attributes}"
> var="attribute">
> > > >         <tr:column>
> > > >             <tr:outputText value="#{ attribute.xnomatrb }"/>
> > > >         </tr:column>
> > > >         <f:facet name="detailStamp">
> > > >             <tr:table value="#{attribute.attributeData }"
> > > > var="attributeData">
> > > >                 <tr:column>
> > > >                     <tr:outputText value="#{attributeData.xvalor}"
> />
> > > >                 </tr:column>
> > > >             </tr:table>
> > > >         </f:facet>
> > > >     </tr:table>
> > > >
> > > > Here is a demo
> > > >
> > http://www.irian.at/trinidad-demo/faces/components/table_nested.jspx
> > > >
> > > > Here is the source
> > > >
> > http://www.irian.at/trinidad-demo/faces/components/table_nested.jspx.source
>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >  On 5/4/07, Francisco Passos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Hello there.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm attempting to use a tr:table within another one and the
> second one
> > > > doesn't show. I'm trying to present a list of values, where each
> value
> > may
> > > > have a list of different values. So I was aiming for something
> like
> > > > >
> > > > > Column 1 | Column 2
> > > > > ---------|-----------
> > > > > Value 1  | SubValue 1
> > > > >          | SubValue 2
> > > > > ---------|-----------
> > > > > Value 2  | SubValue 3
> > > > >          | SubValue 4
> > > > >          | SubValue 5
> > > > >
> > > > > This does not work:
> > > > >
> > > > >     <tr:table value="#{fichaOperadorBean.attributes}"
> var="attribute">
> > > > >         <tr:column>
> > > > >             <tr:outputText value="#{ attribute.xnomatrb }"/>
> > > > >         </tr:column>
> > > > >         <tr:column rendered="#{attribute.xtipdado eq 'S' or
> > > > attribute.xtipdado eq 'L'}">
> > > > >             <tr:table value="#{ attribute.attributeData }"
> > > > var="attributeData">
> > > > >                 <tr:column>
> > > > >                     <tr:outputText value="#{
> attributeData.xvalor}" />
> > > > >                 </tr:column>
> > > > >             </tr:table>
> > > > >         </tr:column>
> > > > >     </tr:table>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Whereas this does indeed work (the same, but using h:dataTable
> instead
> > of
> > > > tr:table):
> > > > >
> > > > >     <h:dataTable value="#{ fichaOperadorBean.attributes }"
> > var="attribute">
> > > > >         <h:column>
> > > > >             <tr:outputText value="#{ attribute.xnomatrb}"/>
> > > > >         </h:column>
> > > > >         <h:column rendered="#{attribute.xtipdado eq 'S' or
> > > > attribute.xtipdado eq 'L'}">
> > > > >             <h:dataTable value="#{ attribute.attributeData}"
> > > > var="attributeData">
> > > > >                 <h:column>
> > > > >                     <tr:outputText value="#{
> attributeData.xvalor }" />
> > > > >                 </h:column>
> > > > >             </h:dataTable>
> > > > >         </h:column>
> > > > >     </h:dataTable>
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there another intended way to use tr:table for this to work?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>


Reply via email to