I am using the the 1.1.6 sandbox but I don't have your problem ... have you
tried a simple page with just one command link on it and see if that works
... do you use any components from the sandbox on all those pages ? are
command buttons also affected or just command links ? if not, have you tried
replacing a command link with a command button ? ...

On 5/16/07, Shane Petroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 Sorin Silaghi wrote:

Can you please send us some details on this ... ? like how do the pages
and action methods look like ?? have you tried to change a commandLink with
a commandButton and see if you get the same errors ?(the unaffected button
might work because of other reasons)

 There is nothing wrong with either the code or the navigation rules, the
breakage appears in areas unmodified for several weeks. The mere presence of
the tomahawk-sandbox-1.1.6-SNAPSHOT.jar in the application's classpath
(web-inf\lib) causes the problem. If I stop tomcat, rename this jar to some
other extension (and comment out the code which needs it), everything works
again. If I rename it back and restart tomcat again, all the links are
broken. I've tried 2 versions of the 1.1.6 sandbox and had the same
problem with both. Which sucks given that I want to use some of the sandbox
components...

Shane

thank you..

On 5/15/07, Shane Petroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I have somehow broken my application and can't figure out what I've done
> to cause it. Every h:commandLink in my app is currently broken and not
> only do I not know why, but I've spent several days working in an area
> of the application which is accessible by navigating via a
> h:commandButton, so I don't even know when I broke things. CommandLinks
> now generate javascript errors either trying to reference a non-existent
> component or a non-existent function. Some of the now broken pages have
> been unchanged for weeks, others completely reworked. Since navigation
> via button works, I can confirm that managed beans are being created and
>
> called, but I can't figure out why the javascript used for commandLinks
> gets hosed. Anyone else seen something like this?
>
> --
> Shane
>
>


--
Shane


Reply via email to