Just an off the wall guess, but this couldn't be some sort of goofy caching
issue?

On 5/30/07, Chris Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Is there anything I can do to help narrow this down?

On 5/30/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hrm, that looks like the same version as Glassfish!  I
> didn't know they were using the RI.  So scrap that theory!
> It still *might* be something wrong in JBoss (maybe their
> implementation of JspIdConsumer in the JSP engine?),
> but this is more puzzling.
>
> -- Adam
>
>
> On 5/30/07, Chris Lowe < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply Adam.
> >
> > Do you happen to know what version of JSF Glassfish is using?
> >
> > From jsf-api.jar that is with JBoss 4.2.0.GA, the manifest states:
> >
> > Manifest-Version: 1.0
> > Specification-Title: JavaServer Faces
> > Created-By: 1.5.0_04-b05 (Sun Microsystems Inc.)
> > Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.6.5
> > Implementation-Title: Sun Microsystems JavaServer Faces Implementation
>
> > Specification-Vendor: JBoss (http://www.jboss.org/)
> > Specification-Version: 1.2MR1
> > Implementation-Vendor-Id: com.sun
> > Extension-Name: javax.faces
> > Implementation-Version: 1.2_04-b10-p01
> > Implementation-Vendor: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
> > Implementation-URL: http://www.jboss.org/
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Chris.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 5/30/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I suspect that there's something wrong with
> > > the implementation of JSF 1.2 used by JBoss, probably
> > > in that implementation's UIComponentClassicTagBase
> > > code or something similar.  The behavior you're describing
> > > doesn't occur with Glassfish.
> > >
> > > -- Adam
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/30/07, Chris Lowe < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I have a project that is running Trinidad and I recently upgraded
> to
> > JBoss
> > > > 4.2.0.GA.  As part of this upgrade I also migrated to JSF 1.2 (the
> > latest
> > > > Seam version requires me to do this).  Ever since then, whenever I
>
> > submit a
> > > > form that fails validation, the form renders the correct
> validation
> > messages
> > > > but I get some weird rendering of the form. It's actually like the
> > previous
> > > > HTML doesn't get cleared and the new form + validation errors gets
> > tacked
> > > > onto the end - I'm literally seeing double. If I click my submit
> button
> > > > again, then a third instance will be tacked onto the bottom, and
> so on.
> > If
> > > > at this point I simply refresh the page, then everything resets
> back to
> > > > normal. If I use the application without causing validation errors
> then
> > > > everything works as normal. I get the same behaviour on FireFox
> and IE
> > and
> > > > there are no exceptions in the logs.
> > > >
> > > > I tried updating the Trinidad build to
> > trinidad-*-1.2-07-may-SNAPSHOT.jar,
> > > > but to no avail.
> > > >
> > > > I eventually tracked the strange behaviour down to my usage of
> > <trh:body>,
> > > > if I use a vanilla body tag then the page duplication problem
> goes.
> > > > However, I still get similar issues with <tr:commandLink> - the
> instance
> > of
> > > > the link is duplicated with each form submission that causes a
> > validation
> > > > error.  Changing to <h:commandLink> again, resolves this issue.
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone come across this before?
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Chris.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>


Reply via email to