Hi Mario,
here the strings:
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXSelectBoolean
public static final java.lang.String COMPONENT_FAMILY =
"org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.SelectBoolean";
public static final java.lang.String COMPONENT_TYPE =
"org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.SelectBoolean";
package org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXSelectOne
public static final java.lang.String COMPONENT_FAMILY =
"org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.SelectOne";
public static final java.lang.String COMPONENT_TYPE =
"org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.SelectOne";
package org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXSelectMany
public static final java.lang.String COMPONENT_FAMILY =
"org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.SelectMany";
public static final java.lang.String COMPONENT_TYPE =
"org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.SelectMany";
HTH,
regards,
Martin
On 6/1/07, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Matthias!
> Hi Matthias!
>
>> But, the problem is, that Family/Type are strings. Why not going
>> against the "base" interfaces, provided by JSF ?
>>
>> -javax.faces.component.EditableValueHolder
>> -javax.faces.component.ActionSource
>>
When I hook on one of the UISelect* components I use a different event
action. Instead of onkeypress the component will automatically choose
onchange.
This will be done by checking for one of
UISelectBoolean.COMPONENT_FAMILY, UISelectMany.COMPONENT_FAMILY,
UISelectOne.COMPONENT_FAMILY
Is there something similar for Trinidad?
Its just to make the component a little bit smarter, the user/in is
always able to define which even to use as attribute.
Ciao,
Mario
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
