This reply is confusing. :) Oracle's 11 Bridge and Webcenter WILL work
with Trinidad. 10.1.3.2 will not.
Scott
Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hey Chris,
The 10.1.3.2 bridge will work with ADFFaces, not Trinidad. The 11
Bridge from the latest release should be mostly feature complete. The
reason for this is that the 10.1.3.2 solution was done after ADFFaces
was released so there was little effort in making it fully complete.
Since the 11 bridge was built around the Trinidad work (and takes into
account much of the issues that will be provided by 301) we were able
to provide a relatively stable Proof of Concept.
Let me know if you have issues getting 11 to work and I'll help you
our. It should be pretty straight forward though.
Scott
Innes, Chris wrote:
Hi all,
I understand there are a number of issues/limitations around
portletization and Trinidad and that these issues will be resolved
with JSR301. However, from what I’ve been reading it seems possible
to expose a Trinidad portlet at this time if one accepts these
limitations. I’ve been trying all sorts of combinations and cannot
get it too work. Can somebody please post a configuration,
portlet.xml & web.xml, of a Trinidad application exposed as a portlet
that is functioning and that I can try against my basic application.
I am running against the Oracle webcenter preconfigured OC4J, as my
portlet container, that comes bundled with JDeveloper 10.1.3.2
I am happy to use with the Oracle Portlet Faces Bridge or any other
bridge.
Scott, I’ve noted entries about a proof-of-concept bridge based on
the Oracle portlet faces bridge, can you please provide us with more
information on that proof-of-concept?
Thanks,
Chris.
