AFAIK, we don't use the "modal" flag, but instead try to use event capture.
-- Adam On 6/19/07, Matt Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Scott, Aside from the description over at [1] for why it was changed to a privileged feature, I can imagine that companies making popup ads would love to make their popups take control of the browser. I think a preferred alternative would be to otherwise block user input (keyboard, mouse clicks, etc.) in the dialog's launcher window rather than attempting to use this privileged feature. [1] - http://secunia.com/advisories/13786/ Regards, Matt On 6/19/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The more I look at this the more I dislike trying to request the > security. Enabling this feature in Firefox makes Firefox vulnerable to > script attacks. What do others think? > > Scott > > Scott O'Bryan wrote: > > Hey Mike, do you have a JIRA ticket for this? If you do I can try to > > see about submitting a patch. I'll begin working on this. > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > >> It appears that with firefox the modal setting (if that is what > >> Trinidad is using) requires special privileges to take effect. > >> http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/DOM:window.open#Features_requiring_privileges > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> *"Adam Winer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>* > >> > >> 06/19/2007 11:54 AM > >> Please respond to > >> "MyFaces Discussion" <[email protected]> > >> > >> > >> > >> To > >> "MyFaces Discussion" < [email protected]> > >> cc > >> > >> Subject > >> Re: [Trinidad]Dialogs not modal in firefox > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> It's a bug with our Firefox JS - or, perhaps, something that just > isn't > >> possible with Firefox? I'd love any insight into how to make the > >> dialogs > >> modal in Firefox. > >> > >> -- Adam > >> > >> > >> On 6/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> > > >> > It appears that dialogs work differently in IE and Firefox. In IE > >> they are > >> > modal. In Firefox they are not. Is there something I am missing? > >> (I am > >> > using the JSF 1.2 branch) > >> > > > > > >
