Now it works without problems, thank you!

I already feared that the original behavior is the expected behaviour. However, I still think that it would be handy to have a detail functionality where it is possible to fold/unfold the detail without triggering validation and still being able to save the content of the closed detail. But maybe it is possible to implement it myself in javascript, if we really need to have this functionality...

Henk

Adam Winer wrote:
BTW, to be clear:  the original behavior, where contents
are not submitted with the "details" are closed, is
currently "not a bug" - set immediate to false (the default).

What I fixed was the issue where the contents were
showing up blank, which was a bug that would
affect any use of nested tr:tables.

-- Adam



On 6/25/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, the detailStamp bug is fixed.


-- Adam


On 6/25/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've filed the detailStamp bug as:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-75
>
> It repros in the Trinidad demo bundle too.
>
> -- Adam
>
>
> On 6/25/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 6/22/07, Henk Vanhoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Finally, I have found some time to make a testproject where this
problem
> > > (bug?) can be duplicated...
> > >
> > > There is a jsp in this project
> > > (/detailstamptest/faces/table/changeTable.jspx) which
consists of a
> > > table with one element. Next to this element there is a 'Show detail'
> > > link. When you click on this link you see a new table with two
> > > addresses. When you close the detail and reopen it, the detail-table
is
> > > empty and there are some error-messages in the logs ("Exception while
> > > determining read-only state of value-binding").
> > >
> > > This problem can be solved by changing the
> > > org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.CLIENT_STATE_METHOD param
in web.xml from
> > > "all" to "token".
> >
> > I can reproduce this.  It's strange - I assume it's a serialization
> > issue somewhere in the table state saving code, but just a guess.
> >
> > > However, now there is a new problem... When you open
> > > the detail, change one of the street-names, close the detail again and
> > > then hit the save-button you can see in the log-messages that the
> > > changes are not submitted to the server! When you leave the detail
open
> > > and hit the save-button, the changes are submitted...
> >
> > The tables have immediate="true" on them, which means that the
> > values aren't pushed to the model when you toggle the table.
> > Remove immediate="true".
> >
> > -- Adam
> >
>




Reply via email to