On 7/10/07, Danny Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm currently moving the tr:messages code from the old 'laf' package into
org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.renderkit.core.xhtml.MessageBoxRenderer
(extends XhtmlRenderer) unless someone tells me otherwise.

Sounds great!

Once working, we can factor this into the inline validation so messages are
also posted there.  If simple="true" and tr:messages doesn't exist, I
propose we then pop an alert.

+1

-- Adam


Danny

Any thoughts on how we'd like the MessageBoxRenderer to handle other


On 7/10/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-94
>
> Thanks, Adam
>
>
> On 7/9/07, noah <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > On 7/6/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If you remove simple="true" from the inputText, what happens?
> > > Or, if you set an "id" on the tr:inputText and add a tr:message
> > > component, what happens?
> >
> > Removing it and clicking the link prints a nice message next to the
> > form field.  Also, adding
> > <tr:message for="foo" />
> > and setting the input's id to foo gives the same effect.  So I think
> > you're right, it silently chokes if there isn't anywhere to show the
> > message.
> >
> > >  simple="true" means
> > > there's no implict message component in the content.
> > >
> > > My suspicion is that the client-side validation is trying
> > > to show the error message inline, failing to find anywhere
> > > to write the message, and just swallowing it.  We
> > > could either:
> > >   1. show these messages as JS alerts
> > >   2. show these messages in some other block of content,
> > >     picked perhaps arbitrarily  (in tr:messages by default,
> > >      otherwise at the head of the page?)
> > >   3. blow off client-side validation altogether for those elements
> > >
> > > -- Adam
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/6/07, noah < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I'm getting weird client side behavior with the tr:inputs.  It seems
> > > > to be connected to validation. The example below just has one
required
> > > > field, but I get the same behavior on larger forms when other
> > > > validation rules are not satisfied.
> > > >
> > > > <tr:document xmlns=" http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
> > > >    xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets";
> > > >    xmlns:f=" http://java.sun.com/jsf/core";
> > > >    xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html";
> > > >    xmlns:tr=" http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad";>
> > > >   <tr:form>
> > > >       <tr:messages />
> > > >
> > > >       <h:outputText value="Foo=#{pageFlowScope.foo }" />
> > > >       <tr:inputText required="true" simple="true"
> > > > value="#{pageFlowScope.bar}" />
> > > >       <tr:commandLink text="foo">
> > > >          <f:setPropertyActionListener
target="#{pageFlowScope.foo}"
> > > > value="bar" />
> > > >       </tr:commandLink>
> > > >    </tr:form>
> > > > </tr:document>
> > > >
> > > > Anyhow, if the input field is blank clicking the link does nothing.
No
> > > > messages, nothing.  If I switch to an h:inputText, the form submits
> > > > and I get a message.  Do I need to do something special to get
> > > > messages from the client side validation that appears to be going
on?
> > > >
> > >
> >
>



--
Chordiant Software Inc.
www.chordiant.com

Reply via email to