Zied Hamdi-2 wrote: > > I'd say you're a little "direct" with the MyFaces team, comparing the RI > and > MyFaces with all its subprojects is a little "unfair" comparaison seen > that > the RI doesn't have to handle nor ajax features nor css beside the fact > that > it's definitely less rich in its components, >
True enough. For the longest time, the RI only provided what the spec required. This isn't 100% true now. We do have a small sandbox with AJAX components. That said, my hats off to the MyFaces folks for having the number of subprojects they have. It says a lot about JSF as a technology. Zied Hamdi-2 wrote: > > in addition to the fact that > MyFaces is not "just" Tomahawk, and that the RI is only a sort of "testing > labs" with no performance objectives. > Sorry. That's just gross mis-information. The 1.2 RI has been out for over a year and performance has been a key goal during that period. Maybe you should look at this: http://blogs.sun.com/rlubke/entry/jsf_ri_performance_scalability The 1.2 RI is being used in production and is production quality. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Myfaces-1.2.0-setup-issues-%28again%29-tf4112450.html#a11711144 Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
