Hi, I have uploaded my little project which I created with info from the wiki and other sources here:
http://code.google.com/p/tomahawk-facelets It should be supporting tomahawk 1.1.6 and the sandbox. Hope it helps! Bruno On 31/07/07, Wolf Benz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thx Alexander, > For what Tomahawk version is this? (116/117?) > -Wolf > > On 7/31/07, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It is probably that the next major version of tomahawk (the one > > explicitly created for jsf 1.2) will integrate the facelets taglib > > generation in the build process, as it will take advantage of the code > > generation of the trinidad's maven-faces-plugin. > > > > In the meanwhile, I use this library (implemented by myself): > > > > http://people.apache.org/~baranda/tomahawk-facelets-1.0.jar > > > > Feel free to use it, apache license... > > > > Cheers, > > > > Bruno > > > > On 31/07/07, Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121) > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > instead of supplying two taglib-files... just create two jar-files with > > > nothing more in it, than > > > the two taglib files... > > > Then the deployment of the two jar-files is enough, whereas the deployment > > > of the two taglib-files > > > requires additional work from the user... > > > > > > regards > > > Alexander > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Wolf Benz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 11:56 AM > > > To: MyFaces Discussion > > > Subject: Re: [Tomahawk] facelets > > > > > > > > > I talked about this with Werner Punz... > > > I thought: why not putting this file right away in the meta-inf of the > > > Tomahawk jar? > > > Won't harm nobody but will certainly help a lot of people. > > > Although I still subscribe to that idea, he had a point also: > > > > > > MF and facelets are indeed 2 different technologies, better keep the 2 > > > apart. > > > > > > > > > Yet, it's another thing we can';tr forget to set up and currently the file > > > @MF Wiki is indeed to be stitched together manually with is kinda funny > > > (unprofessional). > > > I think there is room for improvement, either in the form of a > > > facelets-integrated download. (so Toma & Sandbox WITH the taglibs in > > > their > > > meta-in dirs) or at least another entry in the download table just for > > > facelets: a link to the jsf-facelts.jar, and 2 links, to the respective > > > taglib files. > > > This, for me, would seem to be its logical place. > > > > > > > > > -Wolf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/31/07, Erlend Hamnaberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > does anyone have an updated tomahawk.taglib.xml ? The one at the wiki > > > > does not seem updated. > > > > > > > > Will Myfaces add full facelets support to its custom components? > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > Erlend > > > > > > > > > > > > >
