Thanks Matthias,

> is that Firefox only ?
good point! Indeed, my screenshots have been made from Firefox. In IE6 the
behaviour
is different: The text area grows as wide as the actual text i.e. the
defined width (via
contentStyle) is ignored. However, at a first glance that looks better than
the texts
exceeding the text area...

> try something like width: 90%;
Er, in fear of missing a joke, where does that leave my desired width (50px
in the example)? 

Best regards,
Carsten


Matthias Wessendorf-4 wrote:
> 
> is that Firefox only ?
> 
> try something like width: 90%;
> 
> :-)
> 
> On 8/8/07, Carsten Pieper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> is this a bug or am I missing something? The situation is as follows:
>>
>>         <tr:inputText label="My short inputText" value="Hello inputText"
>>                 contentStyle="width: 50px;" readOnly="true">
>>         </tr:inputText>
>>
>> The text then exceeds the actual text area as shown in the screenshot
>> (note
>> that
>> the read-only text area background is slightly darker than the rest...).
>>
>> http://www.nabble.com/file/p12049157/inputTextReadOnly.jpg
>>
>> If readOnly isn't set (or false), then everything is as expected as again
>> shown in the screenshot (only 50 px of text are shown, but you can access
>> the rest via mouse/keyboard):
>>
>> http://www.nabble.com/file/p12049157/inputText.jpg
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Carsten
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/-Trinidad--inputText-with-readOnly%3D%22true%22-and-limited-width-shows-strange-behaviour-tf4234891.html#a12049157
>> Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf
> 
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/-Trinidad--inputText-with-readOnly%3D%22true%22-and-limited-width-shows-strange-behaviour-tf4234891.html#a12055245
Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to