My project is also committed to an application server (JBoss 4.0.5) that does not support JSF 1.2. So no Trinidad 1.2 for us either.
Nate Perkins 480-441-3667 [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain GDC4S confidential or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. ________________________________ From: Francisco Passos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 6:14 AM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: [Trinidad] When will the JSF 1.2 branch become trunk? Personally, and I think a reasonable amount of users are in this situation, and despite the fact that I would love to move to 1.2, I cannot. We are using myfaces and facelets on a non-J2EE5 container, which means no myfaces 1.2 for us, even if using facelets - although it would be possible if we decided to use the RI instead. Decisions, decisions... On 8/16/07, noah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We're using 1.2. We didn't have any problems with the upgrade. On 8/15/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nope. FWIW, I'd personally be thrilled for the trunk to be 1.2 - > I've just assumed that this is not what the majority of our users > want, and would like to get some of the really big features - > like improved PPR - done before we move trunk to 1.2, so they're > available to all. > > I think the committers could use some feedback from the > community on this issue! > > -- Adam > > > On 8/15/07, Graeme Steyn < [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Adam, > > > > In the Trinidad JSF 1.2 Support wiki > > ( http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad_JSF12_Support <http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad_JSF12_Support> ) you > > mentioned that "my current thinking is that this should happen when MyFaces > > switches their trunk to JSF 1.2. We should continue to keep around a JSF 1.1 > > branch." > > > > Have there been any further updates related to when this is likely to > > happen? > > > > Thank you. > > > > Regards, > > > > Graeme. > > >
