Bruno,

Thanks for your reply...

Yes I had tried that it gave me the following error:

#{..} is not allowed in template text

Which makes sense, as the EL is not inside JSF but in the regular JSP part
of the page.

Where can I find myfaces-1.2.1-SNAPSHOT? On the snapshot page
(http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/) I only find 1.1.6
releases.

This is used in a production environment, does this snapshot only contain
bugfixes since the stable release 1.2.0? (no major refactoring, new
functionality etc) 

Tx.,

Raphael

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruno Aranda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 29 August 2007 21:29
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: EL problem

Hi, does it work if you use #{...} instead of ${...}? I seem to recall
a bug in myfaces 1.2.0 that has been fixed recently and it should be
fixed in the current snaphots (try myfaces-1.2.1-SNAPSHOT)...

Cheers,

Bruno

On 29/08/2007, Raphael Parree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This problem might have been addressed already within the mailing list. I
> went trough the archives but was unable to find anything (now is the
search
> string "EL problem" not the best search string)
>
> I'm in the process of upgrading to Tomcat 6 (6.0.14) and MyFaces 1.2.0. I
> have a major problem with the EL. My JSF pages are using EL but know they
> all resolve to empty strings (all EL on JSF pages, on JSPs they work).
>
> For example the following fails:
>
> <%@ taglib uri="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core " prefix="f" %>
> <%@ taglib uri="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html " prefix="h" %>
> <html>
>  <head>
>   <link rel="stylesheet" href="../../stylesheets/main.css"
> type="text/css"/>
> </head>
>  <html>
> ...
>        <p>Test:${pageContext.request.contextPath}, ${param.foo}  </p>
>      <f:view>
>        <p>Test:${pageContext.request.contextPath}, ${param.foo}  </p>
>  ...
> </html>
>
>
> On both locations the result of the EL is empty.
>
> Is this a known bug, does it have to do with libraries that i have
available
> in the lib?
>
> Any help is welcome,
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Raphael
>
>
>

Reply via email to