Can I say that always the best practice as to get the best component feature would be to use Ajax4JSF and if not work could I go for Trinindad, Tomahowk, and so on?
----- Original Message ---- From: distillingweb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: MyFaces Discussion <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, September 3, 2007 4:54:08 PM Subject: Re: Simple question about what component to use Thanks for your reply. The idea about the requirement table is very good. However, I would like to have the generics ones, like buttons, grids and so on. Thanks also for the explanation about the different component styles. Do you know where could I find this kind of components comparison behavior? Thank you again. ----- Original Message ---- From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: MyFaces Discussion <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, September 3, 2007 4:36:02 PM Subject: Re: Simple question about what component to use ..depends on what you need ;) Generally the Trinidad components are more refined and offer more functionality. E.g. the Trinidad goButton offers pure client-side javascript handler, the commandButton offers PPR, etc. It would be interesting to see a requirements table matched against the diverse button types.. distillingweb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03.09.2007 16:24 Bitte antworten an "MyFaces Discussion" <[email protected]> An [email protected] Kopie Thema Simple question about what component to use Hello, Let's say that I am using Trinidad + RichFaces + Tomahawk and I need to render a simple button. How could I decide which component to use to reach this simple requirement? Is there any criteria? Thanks in advance. Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online. Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today! ____________________________________________________________________________________ Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games. http://sims.yahoo.com/
