Hello Mike, JSF 2.0 is in very early stage of development, so it's hard to say. However, Trinidad was mentioned as a reference for skinning and PPR in the JSR focus areas, so I think it would look odd if we weren't going to align with it. However, there's always backward compatibility so there's no way to give you a 100% foolproof confirmation now, it'S way too early for that imho.
Ref: https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/proposals/JSF-2_0-draft.html Regards, ~ Simon On 9/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have read where Ajax4jsf is dedicated to being aligned with the ajax > implementation specified in JSF 2.0. I would assume that Dynafaces from > SUN is similar. What about Trinidad's PPR mechanism? I had also read that > ICEFaces approach was very different which could be problematic. > I am trying to guage the long term ramifications of using Trinidad or > ICEFaces.
