As a work around, if you are using facelets you could use c:forEach to
generate new column components during the facelet build. I haven't
used it yet, so not sure if it would work, but have you tried
<tr:iterator>? If it works, the view may be something like:
<tr:table value="#{rows}" ...>
<tr:iterator value="#{columns}" ...>
<tr:column>
</tr:iterator>
</tr:table>
Like I say, I have no idea if this would work, but worth a shot or at
least a look in the code for the DesktopTableRenderer
-A
On 9/10/07, Martin Hinterndorfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> I need to build a table with a variable amout of columns (with different
> headers and data types).
> We are planning to use trinidad, whereas trinidad has no <columns>-Tag, like
> tomahawk has.
> As far as I know, I can use the binding attribute to build the
> component-tree programatically,
> but it looks as if the table will become quite complex (buttons, validators,
> converters...), so this is not a
> very preferable approach.
>
> Does anybody have experience in mixing a trinidad application with the
> tomahawk <t:dataTable> and <t:columns> components?
>
> Any pros or cons?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Martin Hinterndorfer
>
