that means, It would go to the backed bean and then I set a variable and come
back to the same page...
Luka Surija <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...your input page data
...your Audit page data
Sushma Sharma wrote:
> how do I show a section in the same view after the data has been
> validated?
>
> */David Delbecq /* wrote:
>
> If the problem is only that you do not want to display the log
> field at
> same time, you can put the log field entry in a section that is only
> "rendered" after data are validated. It's still the same "view"
> but user
> now only see the log fields.
>
>
> Another possibility, with one page for each data set but only one
> log page
>
> page1: fill data change
> page 1 action : store in session bean a "request for change objet"
> (can
> even be your action bean itself :p)
> navigate to logEntry
> logEntry: fill log informaton
> logEntry action: store log informations, execute the "request for
> change" object you stored
>
> If you want to intercept various steps of JSF lifecycle, this can be
> done with a phase listener. However,while phase listener can be
> great as
> a monitoring tool or to handle special query parameter as
> initialisation
> stuff for beans, it can become a mess if you use it to delay actions.
>
> Sushma Sharma a écrit :
> > My pages are already really big, so I do not want to add audit
> fields
> > also in the same page. I have one page where I have included audit
> > fields also and I am being asked to do it the other way. So, I
> wanted
> > to find a standard way to capture the audit info as I am going
> to need
> > it for other pages also.
> >
> > */David Delbecq /* wrote:
> >
> > Why don't you put the 'audit log' fields in page1, along with
> > datas they
> > change. It's not mandatory, in JSF, that the same bean be used for
> > all
> > component in form. You can update and gather datas from various
> > beans /
> > various request scope in a single form. That way you do all in a
> > single
> > move.
> > Sushma Sharma a écrit :
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have many jsf pages(page1, page2, page 3, page4) where users can
> > > make changes, but before they can submit/save the changes, I
> > have to
> > > take them to audit log page, where they have to enter the
> remedy id
> > > and description of the changes. Currently what I am doing is I am
> > > several pages(auditpage1, auditpage2, auditpage3 etc..) for the
> > audit
> > > log and from each page(page1) I take the users to corresponding
> > audit
> > > page(auditpage1) and in this audt page I specify the actual bean
> > > action to save the changes.
> > > Is it possible that I specify actual action methods in page1and on
> > > clicking the commandButton/link, I intercept the request and
> > take then
> > > to a single audit log and after user enters the details and clicks
> > > another button, resume the action clicked on the page1.
> > > let me know if it is possible and how to do it? If there is any
> > other
> > > better way to do it, please suggest.
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > >
> > > The word "Impossible" itself says " I m possible".
> > > */Sushma/**//*
> > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers
> > > from
> > > someone who knows.
> > > Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The word "Impossible" itself says " I m possible".
> > */Sushma/**//*
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Got a little couch potato?
> > Check out fun summer activities for kids.
> >
>
>
>
>
> The word "Impossible" itself says " I m possible".
> */Sushma/**//*
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Luggage? GPS? Comic books?
> Check out fitting gifts for grads
>
> at Yahoo! Search.
The word "Impossible" itself says " I m possible".
Sushma
---------------------------------
Tonight's top picks. What will you watch tonight? Preview the hottest shows on
Yahoo! TV.
