Hi Bjoern,

First sorry for the delay, I was out of office.

But thanks a lot for your informations. I hoped to get a little more
feedback on how to get it running on Glassfish. The problem is, that my web
application should be shared (it's open-source) and thus I think it's kinda
unpractical having the need to actually prepare the different application
servers first, especially in existing production environments. My goal was
to provide one WAR file that just has to be dropped in.

But maybe that isn't a very realistic goal to reach, so I might be trying to
make friends with a solutions like the one you described... :-)


Best regards
Hendrik


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Björn Thalheim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 2:59 PM
> To: MyFaces Discussion
> Subject: Re: MyFaces on Glassfish
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Hendrik Beck schrieb:
> > What I could find out (if I understood it right) is, that Glassfish
> bundles
> > the JSF Sun-RI with Glassfish and prefers that impl over the one bundled
> > with the web app (which would be MyFaces in my case). Uhm. Are there any
> > people out there doing that (I assumed, there must be a lot of people
> doing
> > that)? Can anyone give a definitive yes or no?
> 
> Well it should work, but it is not trivial. In my case I try to run
> Glassfish with the builtin JSF RI plus Trinidad (which turns out to also
> not run immediately, because Trinidad is an extension of MyFaces).
> Somebody else made it run, it works now for me because I copied an extra
> folder with a few jars into the lib directory of the Glassfish
> installation. Sorry I can't tell you more about it, my knowledge about
> why that works now is quite limited.
> 
> > Maybe another note: I am using the MyFaces impl as well as Tomahawk. Am
> I
> > right that these problems are mostly related to MyFaces and not to
> Tomahawk
> > because MyFaces and the Sun-RI are kinda competing impls and Tomahawk is
> > just an "additional package"?
> 
> I would support this opinion. Tomahawk neved caused me any trouble.
> 
> Björn

Reply via email to