Hi, The only issue that I noticed which is important to have fixed in the 1.2.3 rc ( at least for our project ;) is the panelPopup with modal=true in FF2. AFAIK it is fixed in 1.0.3, according to below attached mail, and so I assume it will also be in 1.2.3 hopefully :-)
We have been working with a 1.2.3. SNAPSHOT for a while and it seemed rather stable to us. So I would vote for a go at 1.2.3rc (again, provided above fix is contained ;) Best wishes, Wolfgang. On 10/16/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi, I am still behind my mails, but noticed that a 1.2.3-branch has been created. I'd like to ask for a timeframe for when we can try to release a 1.2.3, based on this branch. Are there any (big) know issues? Did someone used it for testing already? Thx, Matthias ----- Weitergeleitet von Wolfgang Toepfer/PTA_GL/De am 16.10.2007 15:01 ----- "Andrew Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11.10.2007 18:08 Bitte antworten an "MyFaces Discussion" <[email protected]> An "MyFaces Discussion" <[email protected]> Kopie Thema Re: [Trinidad] tr:panelPopup broken in Trinidad 1.2.2 with FF 2.x ? 1.2.3 will have some large position fixes. 1.0.3 already has them. On 10/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > For your information, as I am not sure wether this is a known problem > or just a configuration issue on my side. > > I tried a simple popup such as > > <tr:panelPopup text="Auftragsselektion!" title="Gefundene Auftraege" > alignment="center" modal="true"> > > <tr:outputText value="Do you want to finish?" /> > > > > <trh:rowLayout> > > <tr:commandButton accessKey="1" text="1:Cancel" > > action="fXAbbrechen"/> > > <tr:commandButton accessKey="2" text="2:Ok" > > action="f1Change"/> > </trh:rowLayout> > > </tr:panelPopup> > > However, this only works in IE 7 but not in FF 2.x. In FF the behaviour is > strangely buggy: the mouse pointer > switches to a "prohibited" symbol and everything is disabled apart from FF's > close button. BTW there is no > Javascript error. > > Any ideas regarding this behaviour? > > Thanks, > Wolfgang. > >
