FYI ... The preliminary RI for JSR-301 Faces Portlet Bridge should be exposed as a new MyFaces subproject in the next day or two.  You might consider switching to using this bridge going forward as the JSR has/is trying to account for all the various issues folks have run into with past bridge's and provide as complete a solution as possible across as many environments as possible.  testing this work out in a WebSphere environment would certainly help to strengthen the work on this JSR.
    -Mike-

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I am using MyFaces Portlet Bridge i.e. MyFacesGenericPortlet for the portlet-class . Is that not the correct one ?

Anyway , I'll try the one you suggested . Hope it works


Thanks
Shipra



Bernhard Huemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

10/23/2007 02:07 PM

Please respond to
"MyFaces Discussion" <[email protected]>

To
MyFaces Discussion <[email protected]>
cc

Subject
Re: Myfaces/Tomahawk on IBM WebSphere Portal Server 6







Hello,

I can't access the project at the moment, but the configuration is
rather simple anyway. Due to the exception you've reported on this
mailing list, I assume you're not using a Portlet Bridge? However, I've
been using the Pluto Portal Bridge
(http://portals.apache.org/bridges/multiproject/portals-bridges-jsf/index.html).
There's also a sample JSF portlet available!

You could also use the JSR-301 Portlet Bridge.

regards,
Bernhard

On 10/23/2007 +0200,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello Bernhard
>
> Few weeks back , you mentioned that  you got Myfaces successfully
> running on WebspherePortal 6 .  Can you please send me a relavent
> snippet of your portlet.xml & web.xml , where you configure MyFaces
> related parameters.
>
> I am getting distorted pages & null pointers when I switch between
> portlets .  Earlier I thought it was because of duplicate clientId in
> tomhawk datascroller .So, I got rid of it  . Duplicate clientid issue is
> gone , but the Null pointers are still there which I am guessing causing
> distorted pages.
>
> With the portlet & web.xml , I just want to verify , if i have
> configured things correctly .
>
> Thanks
> Shipra
>
>
>
> *Bernhard Huemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>*
>
> 10/04/2007 01:58 PM
> Please respond to
> "MyFaces Discussion" <[email protected]>
>
>
>                  
> To
>                  MyFaces Discussion <[email protected]>
> cc
>                  
> Subject
>                  Re: Myfaces/Tomahawk on IBM WebSphere Portal Server 6
>
>
>                  
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> which version of MyFaces and which portlet bridge are you using? I'm
> just asking as I didn't face those exceptions. Perhaps, if I've got time
> left on the weekend, I'll create an example project (sort of "archetype
> project").
>
> regards,
> Bernhard
>
> On 10/04/2007 +0200,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>  >
>  > We had tough time . Then finally we had to hack My Faces ( with help of
>  > IBM consultant ) to make it somewhat work .  Of particular note IBM
>  > support is useless . You have to pay them to get a consultant.
>  >
>  > Still getting duplicate clientId exceptions , due to which page renders
>  > incorrectly when visited again in same session .
>  >
>  > What stage are you at ? What is the error you are getting?
>  >
>  > If someone have any solution to this , please let us know.
>  >
>  > Shipra Jain
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > *<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>*
>  >
>  > 10/04/2007 09:36 AM
>  > Please respond to
>  > "MyFaces Discussion" <[email protected]>
>  >
>  >
>  >                  
>  > To
>  >                  <[email protected]>
>  > cc
>  >                  
>  > Subject
>  >                  Myfaces/Tomahawk on IBM WebSphere Portal Server 6
>  >
>  >
>  >                  
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > Hi, is there any one have used successfully Myfaces/Tomahawk on IBM
>  > WebSphere Portal Server 6?
>  >  
>  > Regards
>  > Mario Buonopane
>  >  
>  >
>  > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
>  > privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have
>  > received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
>  > the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
>  >
>
>


Reply via email to