We are more and more switching to jsf and tomahawk here, The stuff rocks :)
On Nov 29, 2007 8:40 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 29, 2007 7:57 AM, Ron Smits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We use Tomahawk a lot in several projects. I would not like to see > > tomahawk getting swallowed up in trinidad. Each has its place. I would > > prefer to seem the stay the way they are. > > Putting them on-top of Trinidad is only one option. > IMO the commons project will help alot and keeping Tomahawk separate > might be a valid option too. > > I know that there are several projects that use them, and that like them. > Sometimes you hear noise, but you know, you complain vs. 99 good feedbacks, > the complain is what people outside remember... :-) > > > > > > It might be good though to maybe find more developers to keep the > > versions working and in sync with eachother. Shout if you need some > > help. > > you are more than welcome! > -M > > > > > > Ron > > > > > > On Nov 28, 2007 10:35 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Nov 28, 2007 10:20 PM, Philippe Lamote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi List, > > > > > > > > Over the last half year, it seems Tomahawk, despite some fine > > > > components, is dead; the 2.0 release hasn't gotten off the ground for > > > > al these months, and no one seems to be actively developing it. > > > > Trinidad on the other hand seems to acquire more and more momentum. > > > > > > it looks like, more and more questions on Trinidad are asked on the lists, > > > that is true. I'd not say that Tomahawk is dead; I think there are some > > > known > > > issues and work arounds for that (using it w/ myfaces 1.1.x). > > > I know people use it and works fine. > > > > > > > > > > > Now, as Tomahawk has some really cool components Trinidada doesn't > > > > have, and while there is for sure an overlap between the two, are > > > > there any plans for getting rid of this project clutter and unifying > > > > these two project lines, resulting in a focussed approach? > > > > > > You are right, when you say that Tomahawk has interesting components, > > > that aren't available inside of Trinidad. But I'd not say, that Trinidad > > > is not > > > cool. > > > > > > > It is my feeling the current approach hurts the MF project. There > > > > already was quite some comment on TSS on the fact MF was really late > > > > > > Yes, there were some comments, but there will always comments on almost > > > every project :-) > > > > > > > in implementing the 1.2 spec(I know, not only for tech reasons), but > > > > that's not the only problem: there are all these subprojects (what to > > > > advise to newbies? I really couldn't tell) and if you happen to > > > > combine Facelets + MF 1.2 + Tomahawk, you're in for a debugging fest! > > > > The list of issues seems endless. It's no fun anymore. > > > > > > > > Therefore, in the view of the upcoming hackatron event in december, > > > > could we share, here, some ideas/thoughts on possible/preferable > > > > roapdmaps? I'd love to see > > > > - a short term plan to address the Tomahawk 2.0 release > > > > - a mid/long term plan to reduce project clutter (converge the > > > > sublines!) We can move much faster and better, if focussed. > > > > > > Regarding a Tomahawk 2.0 release (or project) I'd love to see it on-top > > > of the > > > Trinidad API / Framework (in JSF-version 1.2) > > > > > > Like pick the "good" / "cool" Tomahawk components, and put them into > > > Trinidad. > > > That needs some work, sure. > > > Willing to help ? > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Wolf > > > > > > > > (Ps I'm not pointing fingers here - I'm just genuinly concerned and > > > > wondering how we could better pick things up from here) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > further stuff: > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > I reject your reality and substitute my own > > --- Adam Savage, the mythbusters > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > further stuff: > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > -- I reject your reality and substitute my own --- Adam Savage, the mythbusters
