I'm confused, if you only have one page, why not just put the
loadBundle before the tr:document tag?
<ui:composition
...namespaces here...>
<f:loadBundle .../>
<tr:document ... />
<ui:composition>
Since the composition doesn't render anything, this shouldn't hurt at all.
If you IDE hates this, try this instead:
<!DOCTYPE ...(if desired)...>
<html
...namespaces here...>
<body>
<ui:composition>
<f:loadBundle .../>
<tr:document ... />
</ui:composition>
</body>
</html>
That way the IDE sees an HTML and BODY tag but will not be included by
facelets because of the ui:composition element.
-Andrew
On Dec 14, 2007 12:46 PM, Renzo Tomaselli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andrew, I don't use templates, only many dynamic components and a single
> page for all. Somewhat unusual, but it works very well.
> So I have nothing before tr:document. I guess I cannot include another
> "html" pair before tr:document, but on the other hand I miss the scope of
> "msg" there.
>
> -- Renzo
>
>
>
> Andrew Robinson wrote:
> The bundle doesn't render anything, so it doesn't have to be in the
> document tag. Just put it at the top of your template and it will
> always be used (I assume your tr:document is in the template).
>
> On Dec 14, 2007 11:30 AM, Renzo Tomaselli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi, until now I used tr:document with a fixed title. Now I would pick up
> a title from bundles, using the title attribute such as in:
>
> <tr:document
> xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets";
> title="#{msg['login.title']}"
> ...
>
> but I need to declare "msg" in:
>
> <f:loadBundle basename="#{sessionBean.bundle}" var="msg"/>
>
> in case of components, I declare this at the beginning of any
> ui:component (I use Facelets) included in a html bracket.
> But in case of tr:document we start the page straight away declaring it,
> e.g. there is no html declaration.
> Where can I place the bundle declaration in this case ?
> Thanks -- Renzo
>
>
>
>
>
>
