also:
" I'm using Tomahawk jscookMenu since Trinidad misses any drop-down menu
component."
someone may be tempted to write one. The rich client offering has a menu so
maybe ppl are just waiting for that donation.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Renzo Tomaselli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Andrew, there was no intention to involve any Trinidad team activity for
> this. Sorry for any misinterpretation.
> I wrote "adapted to Trinidad" not "adapted by the Trinidad team".
> I guess that - since the hacking was done by some MyFaces team - they will
> be eventually pleased to adapt such hack to Trinidad.
> Regards,
>
> -- Renzo
>
>
> Andrew Robinson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 1:40 AM, Renzo Tomaselli <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Matthias,
> > AFAIK jsCookMenu is a third party component adapted by Tomahawk to
> > JSF which in turn should be adapted to Trinidad.
> >
>
> -1
>
> There is no *should*. If someone wants to write a jsCookMenu for trinidad,
> they are welcome to, but it is not the responsibility of the Trinidad team
> to make 3rd party JS libraries work.
>
>
> >
> > By "file a bug against the cookMenu" I guess you mean the Tomahawk team,
> > since they provide the patch which should be patched.
> > Also I guess that many symbols around should prove that Trinidad is in
> > the game.
> > Wouldn't be just as easy as "if (submitForm) ..." ?
> >
> > -- Renzo
> >
> > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Renzo Tomaselli<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Ok, here is a solution.
> > Myfaces adds a MyFacesHack.js to the page for the purpose of adapting
> > jscookMenu to JSF.
> > Here a menu action goes straightaway to form.submit. This doesn't comply
> > with tr:fileDownloadActionListener, don't know why.
> > But replacing at line #28:
> >
> > var dummyForm = document.forms[target];
> > dummyForm.elements['jscook_action'].value = link;
> > dummyForm.submit();
> >
> > simply by:
> >
> > submitForm(target,1, {jscook_action: link})
> >
> > seems to solve the issue, since we go through Trinidad stuff.
> > However I don't know how Myfaces+Trinidad+Tomahawk fit this puzzle (who
> > does what).
> >
> >
> > the big problem here is that two different (JS) libs are used. There
> > is no unique way
> > to handle these different (ajax/js) lib. OpenAjax provides a hub for this..
> >
> > We could "hack" the Tomahawk renderer for the jsCookMenu to go through
> > Trinidad,
> > when Trinidad RenderKit is used.
> >
> > Do you mind to file a bug against the cookMenu ?
> >
> > -M
> >
> >
> > -- Renzo
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Renzo Tomaselli wrote:
> > Yes I will. I'm debugging the involved js machinery to find the issue, I
> > guess jscookMenu submitting skips Trinidad internals.
> >
> > -- Renzo
> >
> > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > can you create an issue + a little simple page snippet ?
> >
> > -M
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Renzo Tomaselli<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi, I have another issue with tr:fileDownloadActionListener.
> > I'm using Tomahawk jscookMenu since Trinidad misses any drop-down menu
> > component.
> > After performing a download action (even canceled), I noticed that any
> > following jscookMenu item action leads to the download action again and
> > again,
> > until next page refresh.
> >
> > -- Renzo
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
